In the Mouth of Madness
1994
D: John Carpenter
**********
Pros: Good Ideas, Good Cast, Some Good Atmosphere
Cons: Not as Much Focus as Carpenter’s Other Movies
NOTE: This was written before the election, and I was laboring under the assumption that there was no chance Trump could win. I was also expecting the Left to not react so insanely. In fact, the appeal of the movie is even greater in the light of their current behavior. Especially with the part about people's turning into beasts and rampaging like crazy people. As it stands, laughter still is the most sane response.
This has been
a frustrating year. Both political
parties have nominated their worst possible candidates, and as a result people
feel helpless. The world seems to have
turned into some kind of surrealist joke, and there’s nothing we can do about
it. Trump’s rise is particularly
frustrating, as he is literally running as a TV strawman of a Republican. Many conservatives are now seeing a world in
which every cartoonish stereotype concocted by their opponents is not only true
but tacitly endorsed by their own party.
It’s like reality itself has been warped by some guy with bad hair.
He has risen to power by manipulating fear, and his constituency
seems to prefer his clownish posturing to facts. A movie that people are often invoking as a
comparison to this insanity is Idiocracy. I’d like to submit John Carpenter’s homage to
H.P. Lovecraft for consideration.
The third part
of Carpenter’s “Apocalypse Trilogy” (after The
Thing and Prince of Darkness), In the Mouth of Madness doesn’t seem to
be one of his more popular movies, but that’s a rather unfair assessment. It’s a movie that uses disturbing ideas for
its fright, rather than straightforward thrills. It also borrows many themes from Lovecraft’s
work. It has similar tropes, and the
title is clearly based off that of At the
Mountains of Madness (and possibly The
Shadow over Innsmouth). This film’s
reality-warping plot, which questions the control we have over our own fates,
lacks the simplicity of Carpenter’s other films, so his directorial style may
not be shining as brightly here. Some
might call it a bit disjointed. I think
that’s why people did not take to this one as well. On a side note, there is one pretentious line
about religion, but it seems to be in line with Lovecraft’s themes.
The movie’s
protagonist is insurance investigator/professional skeptic John Trent (Sam
Neill), who is commissioned by publisher Jackson Harglow (Charlton Heston) to
find his company’s bestselling horror author Sutter Cane (Jürgen
Prochnow). Trent believes this to be a
massive publicity stunt, as well as the rumors that Cane’s readers often go
insane or transform into monsters. Things
begin to get strange when he is attacked by Cane’s agent, who has gone insane
from reading one his books. After
solving a subtle puzzle in Cane’s book covers, Trent locates Hobb’s End, a
fictional town featured in many of the author’s works. Accompanied by Cane’s editor, Linda Styles
(Julie Carmen), he drives to the town.
They
encounter numerous strange and frightening occurrences on their trip, including
hallucinations of monsters and a time distortion. Linda goes to the town’s menacing church to
confront Cane, but is driven insane by his book. Meanwhile, Trent, fleeing from hostile
townsfolk, finds himself in a time loop which only ends when he wrecks his nice Cadillac and resigns to confronting Cane himself. While I’m going off on a tangent, I like how
the time loop represents just how helpless we can feel. History seems to be cyclical, and sometimes I
question how much a person can mean if we can’t really make a difference. It doesn’t matter how much determination or
integrity we have, nothing can change until the hive mind of humanity decides
it’s good and ready for it. Until then
we’re doomed to spin our wheels until we wreck our nice Cadillacs. I’m sorry, things are just getting to
me. I’d better relax and get back to the
plot…
…Anyway, when Trent arrives at the church, he is informed
by Cane that he is merely a character in his final book, a tool to ensure its
publication. He shows Trent a portal
through which he can go back to the real world and tears open his own face to
reveal a rift in reality through which his monstrous masters exit. Trent is pursued by these Lovecraftian beasts
through a corridor when he inexplicably finds himself in a seemingly normal
environment. Like a layered dream, Cane then
toys with Trent’s perception of reality.
At one point, he tells Trent his favorite color is blue, and Trent finds
himself in a completely blue world, much to his horror. Just like in this wretched election cycle,
even the silly moments are frightening simply because they demonstrate our own
powerlessness.
John Carpenter tried to warn us about Hollywood's overdependence on digital color filtering, but we wouldn't listen. |
While In the Mouth of Madness has great
atmosphere, it doesn’t quite demonstrate Carpenter’s stylistic strengths as
well as some of his other movies. Still,
there are plenty of creepy moments.
Frightening images come at you in moderation, and there’s some nice
restraint in their execution. The chase
down the corridor with the swarm of monsters provides only glimpses of the
beings and one split second focused shot of them, making the scene effective on
a more subliminal level. The movie’s
score, by Carpenter and Jim Lang, is not the most memorable in the former’s
movies, but it fits the atmosphere well.
The main theme is a controversial use of rock, but unsurprisingly I like
it and I think it’s oddly fitting. The
cast is very good and it includes John Glover, Bernie Casey, Frances Bay, Wilhelm
von Homburg, and John Carpenter veteran Peter Jason.
Despite all
the undeserved disdain, this is a great existential metahorror film from a
master of the craft. I think that
Carpenter’s most underrated movie might just have a cathartic appeal to those
of us who are frustrated by the reality-butchering absurdity of the 2016 election
year (then again
Like when I found out I couldn't find a Region 1 DVD of this movie on Amazon. |
TRENT: You're waiting to hear about my 'them', aren't
you?
DR. WREN: Your what?
TRENT: My 'them'. Every paranoid schizophrenic has one; a
'them', a 'they', an 'it'. And you want to hear about my 'them', don't you?
DR. WREN: I want to know how you got here.
TRENT: Things are turning to shit out there, aren't they?
TRENT: A word of advice. You want to pull a scam, don't
make your wife a partner. And if you do, don't fuck around behind her back.
LINDA: A reality is just what we tell each other it is.
TRENT: God’s not supposed to be a hack horror writer.
CANE: Did I ever tell you my favorite color is blue?
TRENT: Every species can smell its own extinction. The
last ones left won't have a pretty time with it. In ten years, maybe less, the
human race will just be a bedtime story for their children. A myth, nothing
more.
CANE: I think therefore you are.
GUARD: Do you read Sutter Cane?
[Dr. Wrenn just
glares at him]
TRENT: This book is going to drive everyone absolutely
mad!
HARGLOW: Well, let’s hope so. The movie comes out next month.
TRENT: Like the book?
READER: I love it.
TRENT: Good. Then
this shouldn’t come as a surprise. [attacks
him with an axe]
No comments:
Post a Comment