Friday, August 24, 2012

I Like Zaxby's Better Anyway.


NOTE: I am mostly using the term “liberal” out of convenience.  I’m not lumping all liberals in with these internet liberals whose fanaticism I disapprove of.

     Before I get decried as a homophobe (which, according to the internet, is worse than being a zoophilic Nazi child molester), I must point out that I have no personal objection to homosexuals.  Considering my own various kinks and fetishes, it would be pretty hypocritical if I did.  I do not oppose gay rights.  I believe in Separation of Church and State, and I don’t think defining marriage as a heterosexual institution is the government’s business.  But, oh wait, a chicken restaurant chain DISAGREES WITH ME?  Somebody declare Martial Law!
     Yes, everybody’s been following the Chik Fil-A controversy now.  After its president Dan Cathy publicly stated the company does not support Gay Marriage, many liberals got offended.  Their resultant boycott backfired hilariously.  There’s nothing wrong with boycotting something on ideological grounds or a company pulling its support of another for the same reason, but it’s funny just how bad these people are at it.  When gay rights advocates overhyped their boycott, they apparently forgot that this a divisive issue and calling attention to the fact that Chik Fil-A has taken a position on it will encourage many people to support the chain.  It certainly doesn’t help when you angst about how good you think the food actually is.
     Part of me finds this quite amusing.  The fact that liberals’ apparent love for something conflicts with their ideology just makes me feel warm and happy inside.  This is because I, as a conservative fanboy, am cursed by the fact that nearly every damn artist out there whose work I admire is completely incompatible with me ideologically.  With a few comforting exceptions (like Sam Raimi), most of the celebrities that do agree with me are worthless.  Liberals need to know the sting of a Hollywood letdown.  They deserve that pain.
     As I said before, I don’t have a problem with someone boycotting Chik Fil-A; that’s their First Amendment right.  However, the Left crossed the line when mayors like Rahm Emmanuel announced that they would not even allow Chik Fil-A to open restaurants in their cities.  Libertarian attitudes toward gay marriage suddenly become less relevant when its advocates begin to encroach on the more vital right of Free Speech.
     Not only is that happening, but some of these activists are even trashing restaurants and intimidating employees.  I guess this inconsideration toward these poor people isn’t unsurprising.  I hate listening to people bitch about how Chik Fil-A is closed on Sundays.  Heaven forbid some overworked and underpaid member of the service industry gets one day off when you want your damn chicken fix. 
     What makes me even angrier is when you consider similar past events and observe the hypocrisy of these people.  Remember about a year ago when the Susan G. Komen for the Cure announced that it was no longer going to fund Planned Parenthood, and many liberals threw a tantrum?  A bipartisan charity group decided that it was no longer going to support a divisive cause.  After all, wouldn’t it be unethical to give money to a foundation your donors may be reluctant to support, and wouldn’t it compromise your stated mission?  The Komen group made a logical ethical choice, and these leftists boycotted them, demonstrating that they apparently cared more about abortion than curing a deadly disease.  I hate how some people have to have their cake and eat it too.  Yeah, it’s not enough for them that a group doesn’t oppose their cause; they have to support it.  Funny how these people would boycott a chicken company for taking a side on an issue when they boycotted another entity for doing the exact fucking opposite.  
     Let’s not forget that time when a lot of people got offended by this yummy looking Oreo.  Predictably, those people were mocked for boycotting a food product that disagreed with them….by people who are now boycotting a food product for disagreeing with them.  I love how liberals think that the rules they set for the other side don’t apply to them.  Sure, you might say, “But it’s different because WE’RE  THE GOOD GUYS.”  Well, yeah, that’s what every hypocrite thinks.
Ironically, I’m actually not that big a fan of Chik Fil-A.  It’s ok, but I never understood the fascination for it and I never thought it was anything special.  Personally, I always preferred Zaxby’s sublime buffalo chicken tenders.  I’m probably not going to go out of my way patronize Chik Fil-A, but I won’t boycott it.  I may sympathize with liberals in the war over gay rights, but this is a battle they do not deserve to win.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Anything But.


 
Enchanted
2007
D: Kevin Lima
**********
Pros: Animation of Animated Segment
Cons: Unimaginative premise, Badly developed characters, Forced humor, Bland music, Aspect ratio of animated segment

     You know, there are a lot of bad movies whose appeal I can at least understand.  I hate Transformers, but I know that people like robots destroying things and they might also like (or can at least tolerate) Michael Bay’s crude sense of humor.  Enchanted, on the other hand, confuses me.  This movie garnered a 7.3 on IMDb and a truly absurd 93% on Rotten Tomatoes.  Of course, I understand that the Rotten Tomatoes rating is based on just the percentage of critics who at least found the movie adequate, but this movie isn’t even that.  In fact, I’ve never heard of much hype or enthusiasm for this movie.  People just seem to give it a pass, and I don’t understand why.  It didn't look particularly good to me, but I checked it out anyway, since maybe there might be something to all this praise.  Turns out my instincts were right.
     The movie starts out with an animated segment which hastily introduces us to the characters of the fairy tale world of Andalasia.  It’s not so much a believable world than an efficiently-run sequence meant to establish the various unrealistic tropes of the fairy tale world.  The animation is, of course, done in a traditional 2-D Disney style, so it is visually beautiful and nice to look at.  Well, it would be nice to look at if not for its being shown in a smaller aspect ratio than that of the rest of the movie.  I’m sure the effect wasn’t so annoying in the theater, but I was watching it on video, and I was looking at this:

Needless to say, having a small picture of the most visually pleasing part of movie encapsulated by letterbox bars on all sides was frustrating and distracting.  While I am aware that they were making the fantasy world distinctive from the real world and making a reference to how animated movies are commonly shown in 1.85:1 ratio while many live-action movies are in anamorphic widescreen, this was completely unnecessary.  They didn’t have to split the movie into two aspect ratios.  Not all animated movies are in 1.85:1, and not all live-action are in anamorphic widescreen.  In fact, anamorphic widescreen is usually most appropriate for movies with striking visuals, which does not apply to this film.  I can’t help but contrast this with the intro from The Incredibles, in which the characters are interviewed for television in a standard 3:4 ratio.  The picture was supposed to look like a television broadcast, with grainy, flawed color, and the small picture enhances the intentionally underwhelming appearance.  Once we got into better visuals, the movie extended itself to a better ratio, which is the exact opposite of what Enchanted did.  Also, that sequence in Incredibles only lasted about a minute and a half, while the Enchanted made me suffer through the letterboxed eyesore of its introduction for ten minutes. 
     The animated segment introduces us to Giselle (Amy Adams), who has just met her hero Prince Edward (James Marsden) and plans to marry him the following day.   This angers Edward’s stepmother, Queen Narissa (Susan Sarandon), who tricks Giselle into entering a well which sends her to New York City (the REAL jungle!).  Finding out about this turn of events, Edward, along with Giselle’s annoying talking chipmunk friend, go in after her (the chipmunk turns into a typical CGI-cartoon-animal-in-real-world monstrosity, but he cannot speak.  I’m  not sure if that was a good thing or not).  While her friends attempt to rescue her, Giselle meets cynical divorce lawyer Robert (Patrick Dempsey).  Needless to say, Robert teaches Giselle about the real world, while Giselle teaches Robert to fall in love.  Awww...wait, he already was in love.  HOOoh well, we’ll get to that…
     As for the characters, let’s start out with Giselle.  Much praise was given to Amy Adams’ performance.  She was credited for a competent singing voice as well as “having fun in her role.”  I don’t want to criticize her too much, since she is indeed a talented actress.  I’ve seen her in more watchable movies like Doubt and The Fighter, and she is enjoyable in them.  The problem is Giselle.  She’s not so much a character as she is a caricature of a cartoon character.  Much like Ann Hathaway’s annoying performance in Alice in Wonderland, Adam’s heroine has spaced-out, naïve mannerisms that prevent her from being a believable character.  She’s supposedly based on a cartoon character, but even cartoon characters need to emote convincingly in order to make the audience invested.   The same story rings true for Prince Edward, who is comically oblivious to the workings of the real world during his Quixotic quest to find his beloved.  James Marsden needs a new agent.  Between this and playing a straw loser version of Cyclops in the X-Men series, I’m pretty sure the high point of his career was assassinating Abraham Lincoln in Zoolander. 
     Unlike Edward, however, Giselle eventually does adapt to the real world.  She realizes that love does not come as easily in this universe as it does the fantasy cartoon world as she and Robert fall in love.  Granted, this is character development, but there’s one thing about this that annoys me as a fan of cartoons.  By stating that an unrealistic, shallow simplification of the human condition is simply how the cartoon universe works, the movie not only seems to make the assertion that cartoons are not intelligent, but that they can’t be intelligent.  Brad Bird made a famous observation that animation is not a genre, but a medium.  This movie doesn’t seem to realize that.  In fact, the whole movie could have been animated, and they could have made their points about silly Disney Princess tropes without the dim depiction of animation in general.  This movie is supposed to be an affectionate parody of animation, but comes off as contemptuous instead.
     Giselle’s love interest, Robert, has some workings of a sympathetic character, but he ultimately falls short.  He’s a decent man whose unglamorous profession as a divorce lawyer has given him a cynical view of love.  His job experiences are established by his attempts to sort out a divorce between Clay Davis and his wife.  Despite this, he actually does have a fiancée named Nancy (Idina Menzel), who turns out to be a hopeless romantic despite Robert’s assertion that she is “smart.”  After a hackneyed misunderstanding scene in which Giselle falls on top of Robert right before Nancy walks in, Nancy is easily charmed back into the relationship just by being sent a bunch of flowers.  Right.  It’s a wonder how Mr. “I Don’t Believe in Fairy Tales” sees this woman as a compatible mate.  Hey, even the characters who are supposed to be well developed are badly developed.  Incongruous characterization aside, what really loses me on this guy is that he pulls the Mom from Miracle on 34th Street crap on his daughter.  The motivation may be understandable, but I don’t like how a parent would deprive his own child of fantasy and imagination just because they screwed up their own life and became cynical.  A responsible parent should teach children to tell the difference between fantasy and reality.  Banning the former does not guarantee that child will know how the real world works.
     Long story short, it’s a romantic comedy with a few musical numbers.  Despite Alan Menken’s reputation for excellent musical work in animated movies, I think he’s hit-or-miss.  Apparently, he thought this movie wasn’t worth much effort, so the songs in it are completely phoned-in.  Giselle’s whimsical demeanor charms more people than it should throughout the movie.  Most people would look at her behavior and think she was either mentally handicapped or crazy, but when Clay Davis and his wife see her “I’m a crazy princess and I believe in true love” act for one minute, and are mysteriously inspired to call off their divorce.  Meanwhile, Queen Narissa’s henchman Nathaniel (the always enjoyable Timothy Spall) constantly tries to murder Giselle while being thwarted by the Chipmunk.  Eventually, he gets tired of Narissa’s verbal abuse and ragequits on her, prompting her to come to the real world and get the job done herself. 
     The final faceoff between Narissa and the good guys involves the evil queen’s transforming into a cartoonish CGI dragon and carrting Robert to the top of the Woolworth Building, making it necessary for Giselle to try and save him (Hey, get it? It’s the princess saving the hero!)  The scene is an obvious homage to Malificent’s dragon form in Sleeping Beauty, so imagine that scene with all of the thrill and style absent.  As if the self-conscious referential nature of the film wasn’t heavy-handed enough, Dragon Narissa has to constantly recite tropes in a clichéd genre savvy villain fashion.  Admittedly her, final death is actually kinda cool (She gets cut open and apparently set on fire the substance that enables her fire breath).
     At the end, everyone lives happily ever after.  In addition to Robert and Giselle, Nancy ends up falling in love with Prince Edward, impressed by his simplistic personality and schmaltz.  They move to Andalasia, where one of the more frustrating scenes in the movie occurs.  During their instant wedding, Nancy’s cell phone goes off (seriously, who forgets to turn their cell phone off during their own wedding?), and, after expressing surprise that she still gets reception in an alternate universe, she throws it to the ground and breaks it.  Of course, when you run off to another world to marry a guy you hardly know, it’s not like you want to, you know, keep in touch with your freakin’ family or anything.   Funny how this movie tries deconstruct the unfortunate implications of Disney cartoons, only to add a few of its own.  Also, Nathaniel finds success as an autobiographical author, even though if his book is remotely honest, he’s publicly confessing to multiple counts of attempted murder.  Don’t you just love it when the Big Bad is defeated, and the happy ending involves the evil henchman getting off scot-free despite being in up to his neck and not having gone through any true redemption or remorse?
I'm looking at you, you creepy bastard.
     Enchanted is a movie about how the real world is smarter than the cartoon world, but really isn’t.  The characters from the real world, even though they’re supposed to contrast with the cartoon characters in their realism, are not very well-developed or believable themselves.  The movie even plays some of the bad tropes from Disney movies straight.  In addition to all the fridge logic, the movie really has no magic.  It dwells so much deconstructing the flaws of Disney Princess cartoons that it forgets to have a decent story, and the story it does have is an inane romantic comedy.  Yes, I know that these Disney cartoons tend to have some shallow tropes, but as a cartoon fan, I don’t want to see some meta junk that just points it out.  I want to see an earnest cartoon that fixes those mistakes.  I don’t want to see a movie that points out how the fantasy isn’t real or that it’s just a dream; that defeats the whole damn purpose of watching a fantasy.  Even Shrek, whose cynicism has become dated, was an actually fantasy story set in a fantasy world.  It had its share of metahumor, but it had its style and some earnestness.  It dealt with hackneyed fairy tale tropes by actually subverting them.  Enchanted mostly just lampshaded them rather than truly being subversive.  As I said before, I don’t understand why everyone gives this movie a pass.  Maybe they thought it was different because it was Disney itself making this affectionate self-parody, but to me it was just another one of those hackish cartoon-characters-in-the-real-world movies.  Nothing more.  Nothing less.   


I'm going to take the opportunity to show you why I generally do not follow what professional critics have to say.  Enchanted is in my opinion a banal, unfunny, soulless parody of the style and charm of Disney animated canon, but look how many Disney cartoons it somehow beat out on Rotten Tomatoes, and, yes, I would take any of these over Enchanted, including Pocahontas and Home on the Range.

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs 97%
Pinocchio 100%
Fantasia 98%
Dumbo 97%
Bambi 91%
Cinderella 96%
Alice in Wonderland 80%
Peter Pan 83%
Lady and the Tramp 89%
Sleeping Beauty 88%
101 Dalmatians 97%
The Sword in the Stone 74%
The Jungle Book 86%
Robin Hood 55%
The Rescuers 85%
The Fox and the Hound 69%
The Great Mouse Detective 81%
Oliver & Company 44%
The Little Mermaid 90%
The Rescuers Down Under 65%
Beauty and the Beast 92%
Aladdin 92%
The Lion King 89%
A Goofy Movie 57%
Pocahontas 56%
The Hunchback of Notre Dame 73%
Hercules 84%
Mulan 86%
Fantasia 2000 82%
The Emperor’s New Groove 85%
Atlantis: The Lost Empire 49%
Lilo & Stitch 86%
Treasure Planet 68%
Home on the Range 54%
The Princess and the Frog 84%
Winnie the Pooh 91%


Disney cartoons not your cup of tea? Well, here are more movies that, according to Rotten Tomatoes, are not as good as Enchanted:  
Blade Runner, Gladiator, The Big Lebowski, Requiem for a Dream, Heat, The Crow, Ben-Hur, Return of the Jedi, Dr. Zhivago, The Land Before Time, Miller's Crossing, The Man with Two Brains, Inception, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Doubt, Network, Hard Candy, Goodbye Lenin!, Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, The Fly, Caddyshack, Equilibrium, Batman, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, The Duellists, The Thing, Where the Wild Things Are, 28 Days Later, A Scanner Darkly, RoboCop, The Matrix, The Shawshank Redemption, The Nutty Professor, Army of Darkness, The Deer Hunter, Black Hawk Down, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 1, 1984.  

Monday, August 6, 2012

1999 Movies Ranked




Well, we’re finally in the 90’s, the decade of my youth.  For all the great movies that came out in this decade, it was honestly a huge sci-fi slump.  There were hardly any genre movies worth watching after Terminator 2, and the trend persisted until The Matrix and (seriously) Episode I put an end to it.  These movies started a visuals-heavy era in cinema that we’re actually still going through.


18. Shapeshifter
D: Philippe Browning
**********
It has some amusingly cheesy moments, but I felt like I had passed through a whole lifetime just sitting through this insufferably boring movie.
 

17. Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me
D: Jay Roach
**********
Despite the addition of a couple memorable characters, most of the attempts at humor in this movie die pretty painfully.


16. Deep Blue Sea
D: Renny Harlin
**********
Late 90’s Monster Movie with sharks.  Yeah, we were just making the same monster movie over and over again at the time. 


15. Virus
D: John Bruno
**********
Despite having some interesting and distinctive gore effects, it was just another Late 90’s Monster Movie.


14. The World Is Not Enough
D: Michael Apted
**********
When this came out, it was my favorite Bond movie.  When I revisited it as an adult, I couldn’t take all the terrible double entendres.  Shame, because otherwise it’s a solid action movie and has one of the better Bond themes.


13. Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace
D: George Lucas
**********
This movie has a lot of flaws, but it still has nostalgia value for me.  It has a lot of great scenery, atmosphere, action and music.  It was the first movie I could think of where so much CGI had been used so convincingly, and it’s aged pretty well.  This is why I wasn’t as impressed by the “revolutionary” CGI in Transfomers and Avatar; the Star Wars prequels already set the standard while being more fun to boot.


D: Troy Duffy
**********
Another flawed movie.  It’s message is sullied by the fact that Troy Duffy kind of believes in this vigilante justice and the movie takes itself too seriously toward the end.  The movie is still enjoyable for its comic relief.


11. Toy Story 2
D: John Lasseter, Ash Brannon, Lee Unkrich
**********
This is often seen as a weak link between Toy Story and Toy Story 3, and it isn’t really as great as they are.  Still, despite some repetitive themes amd annoying distractions, it’s a good movie.  I like the opening sequence and Kelsey Grammer’s Stinky Pete.


10. Galaxy Quest
D: Dean Parisot
**********
Much better than I remember.


9. A Christmas Carol
D: David Jones
**********
This movie in which Captain Picard reenacts the Christmas classic on the Holodeck is definitely the best TNG movie I have seen.


8. Payback
D: Brian Helgeland
**********
A fun, humorous noir with a distinctive monochromatic visual style.


7. eXistenZ
D: David Cronenberg
**********
This year had a lot of this movies with this general premise.  This is one with Cronenberg’s distinctive sexual gore.


6. Fantasia 2000
D: Various
**********
Though it doesn’t have quite the impact or edge of the original, it does its job.  Great classical songs with animated accompaniment.  While I do agree with others that the celebrity cameos are annoying (except James Earl Jones), but I actually do like the flamingos.


5. The Iron Giant
D: Brad Bird
**********
An animated movie that’s original while still having a child-like sense of wonder.


4. Sleepy Hollow
D: Tim Burton
**********
The story is a bit complicated for the source material, but it’s fun and the dark visuals of this movie are among the best in Burton’s movies.


3. South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut
D: Trey Parker
**********
The animation isn’t very impressive, but the satire and humor more than make up for that.  The songs may be foulmouthed and humorous, but they’re still genuinely good and catchy.   


2. Fight Club
D: David Fincher
**********
An excellent dark comedy with great visual style.


1. The Matrix
D: The Wachowski Bros.
**********
It has some implications that are ambiguously disturbing, but it’s visuals, story and pacing make it one of the most watchable movies ever.  The themes have been done before, but this movie refreshed them by telling it in compelling and well-paced story.  Its action and style took filmmaking to a new level, though the visual movies that followed it don’t have the same mystique it does.




Sunday, July 29, 2012

2000 Movies Ranked





25. How the Grinch Stole Christmas
D: Ron Howard
**********
A really irritating and bloated movie that kicked off an ongoing trend of terrible Seuss adaptation.  The Grinch’s makeup was pretty good, though.


24. Titanic: The Legend Goes On
D: Camillo Teti
**********
Insufferable, insulting, ripped-off and poorly animated.  I thought about giving this movie two stars just to differentiate it from the animated Titanic movie that tastelessly retcons the tragedy altogether, but it really doesn’t deserve it.


23. Nutty Professor II: The Klumps
D: Peter Segal
**********
One of my favorite comedies produced a truly awful sequel.


22. Hollow Man
D: Paul Verhoeven
**********
The late 90’s was plagued with all these generic monster movies.  Extremely formulaic, they always featured a bunch of people (usually scientists) trapped in an isolated environment with some monster.  The gimmick may have been different, but they were all essentially the same movie.  This one is particularly disappointing since it’s from the legendary Paul Verhoeven.  He put in some subtle CGI shots of the invisible man’s dong, and that was all that differentiated it.  Good work.


21. American Psycho
D: Mary Harron
**********
A Pretentious  and typical movie about 80’s excess.  I like Christian Bale, but his acting in this is really off.  He overacts pretty painfully at times in this movie.


20. Battlefield Earth
D: Roger Christian
**********
An utterly inept scientologist movie with some interesting visuals.  I particularly disliked the constant camera angles.


19. Mission: Impossible II
D: John Woo
**********
The complex plot of the first movie was eschewed for brainless action.  Woo may have been a master in Hong Kong, but most of his movies made here are underwhelming due to the lack of control he had over them.  Still, the theme song is cool. Not even Limp Bizkit can ruin the Mission Impossible theme…unless they add whiny vocals from one of their awful songs for no reason.   


18. Gone in 60 Seconds
D: Dominic Sena
**********
I remember going to the movies with people during debate camp, and the only two movies playing were this and the underrated Titan AE.  Of course, I was 15 and like “I’m too old for cartoons,” so I went to see this and I regret it.


17. X-Men
D: Bryan Singer
**********
The movie had some strengths, like the closing theme and the use of a very good cast.  It also had good atmosphere and it set up the story well, but my suspension of disbelief was broken by the machine that turned people into mutants.  I also love how they even tried to sneak an anti-gun moment into a movie that’s arguing that we should let people with catastrophically dangerous superpowers run free without any regulation.  Why do people put anti-gun messages in superhero stories?  Do I even have to explain why that doesn’t work?


16. The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle
D: Des McAnuff
**********
Some funny moments, but it was mostly obnoxious and the CGI on the main characters was awful.


15. Boiler Room
D: Ben Younger
**********
A thrilling look at fraudulent brokerage firms.


14. Ginger Snaps
D: John Fawcett
**********
Typical monster-as-metaphor-for-puberty movie.  Well-executed but, oddly gets less gory throughout its runtime.
 
 
13. Bedazzled
D: Harold Ramis
**********
Though everyone else seems to dislike this movie, I found it pretty funny.  I actually like Brendan Fraser, and this movie shows his versatility by playing many different kinds of funny versions of the same character.


12. Titan A.E.
D: Don Bluth, Gary Goldman
**********
Other Don Bluth fans seem to dislike this movie because they weren’t kids when they saw it.  It’s actually a solid movie, which was refreshing after a decade’s worth of bad Don Bluth movies.


11. Almost Famous
D: Cameron Crowe
**********
A pretty funny movie about a young journalist hanging out with a crazy rocker.


10. A Perfect Storm
D: Wolfgang Petersen
**********
A poignant movie about a tragic sea accident.  It’s a conventional movie, but a very good one.


9. Chicken Run
D: Peter Lord, Nick Park
**********
A funny cartoon with some good music provided by John Powell.


8. Meet the Parents
D: Jay Roach
**********
A funny comedy, but the fact that the protagonist's name is "Gaylord Focker" is not nearly as funny as its writers thought.


7. The Emperor’s New Groove
D: Mark Dindal
**********
Though the animation is a little underwhelming compared to previous Disney movies, the movie is easily one of the most genuinely funny cartoons the company has produced.

6. Memento
D: Christopher Nolan
**********
A clever and darkly humorous thriller that gave us a hint of Nolan’s career.

5. O Brother, Where Art Thou?
D: The Coen Bros.
**********
A funny, quirky retelling of the Odyssey set in the Southern United States.


4. Unbreakable
D: M. Night Shyamalan
**********
People always seem to forget about this movie when talking about Shyamalan’s work.  It’s actually a very good take on the superhero archetype, and demonstrates that Night is really more of a two-trick pony.


3. Requiem for a Dream
D: Darren Aronofsky
**********
Aronofsky’s nightmarish look at drug addiction also has an excellent score.


2. Best in Show
D: Christopher Guest
**********
Christopher Guest’s satire of the quirky world of dog shows is one of the funniest movies I’ve ever seen and it’s up there with This Is Spinal Tap.  It was a tough choice between this and…


D: Ridley Scott
**********
This modern-day Ben-Hur is Scott at his best.  It has great acting, great characters, visceral action, beautiful cinematography and one of the best movie scores I’ve ever heard.  Probably inspired a few swords and sandals action movies, but none of them came close to being as good.  One of the few Best Picture winners that actually deserved it.  There seems to be a baffling backlash against this movie recently, and I just can't fathom it.  I guess some people just don't like awesomeness.