Monday, April 29, 2013

My Favorite Show



 

Arrested Development
2003-2006, 2013-
**********
Pros: Great humor and acting, Memorable characters
Cons: A lot of stupid humor to go with the good stuff

      I wanted to get this review written before the show is revived as a Netflix original next month.  I also kind of obligated myself to this review because of the artwork for my TV Reviews.  Unfortunately, that also means I eventually have to do reviews of Glee and My Gym Partner is a Monkey.  I’m not looking forward to that.  As I pointed out before, Arrested Development is my favorite TV show, but I want to review it objectively and point out that it may not be perfect.
     The show revolves around the family of housing mogul George Bluth, Sr. (Jeffrey Tambor), who is arrested by the SEC for corporate corruption.  With the family patriarch in jail and the company accounts frozen, his pampered family has to figure out a way to eke out a living.  Only George Sr.’s son Michael (Jason Bateman) seems to have a clue or any sense of responsibility and he tries to keep the family together and revive the business.  Arrested Development mixes quirky situational comedy and dry wit very well.  The comedy often comes from inventive and intertwined story arcs based on the characters’ foolish schemes and misunderstandings.  There are many quirky hipster comedies that rely on pretentious anti-humor, but fortunately Arrested Development is not one of them.  For example, a lesser hip comedy would have just had Tobias (David Cross) paint himself blue for no other reason to distract the audience, but in this show he does so for an established reason (he wants to join the Blue Man Group after having mistaken a show for a support group for depressed men).  It’s this kind of zany, story-based situational comedy that makes this show great.  The humor is also enhanced by the excellent performances by the actors.  Maybe a little too much, as some actors seem to have pigeonholed themselves into these roles.  I love Will Arnett as an actor, and he’s too good to simply limit himself to playing douchebags in comedies, especially comedies that will never hold a candle to this one.  David Cross also deserves some credit for his willingness to sacrifice his body for laughs.  He’s such a gifted comic actor that he can even take an unfunny sitcom one-liner and make it sound funny.  It also makes one forget that he’s kind of a tool in real life.
Which kinda makes this even funnier to watch.
        I’ve heard so many people say shows like this aren’t funny because of the “odd, quirky characters” which is like saying “I don’t understand the basic concept of humor.”  In fact, it’s the characters that help make me love this show.  Maybe I just come from a quirky family but I do understand people like this exist and I can relate a bit more to their wackiness (although fortunately not to their irresponsibility).  In fact, one of the main things that drew me to the show was that the three Bluth brothers are uncannily similar to me and my brothers.  Michael is pretty much my oldest brother: a Type-A personality with a strong work ethic who uses tough love to keep the family in line.  G.O.B. (Will Arnett) is like my middle older brother: snarky and self-centered.  And Buster (Tony Hale) is me: the socially awkward baby of the group.  Fortunately, we’re far more functional than our TV counterparts and lack their worst character flaws, but in essence we’re the same people, just with better values.  I’m also happy to mention that our parents are nothing like the corrupt evil George Sr. and Lucille (Jessica Walter). 
     While the more obvious choice for the funniest Bluth is either GOB or Tobias, my choice is Michael.  As the straight man, he says the best lines.  Everything he says is sharp, dry and witty; a perfect response to the madness of his uncaring family.  I also enjoy how he reluctantly tries to help the family while it slowly corrupts him.  He often ends up doing questionable things in order to help it, like attempting to legally defend his clearly guilty father.  This clashes with his desire to care for his hilariously awkward son George Michael (Michael Cera) and set a good example for him.  The relationship between the two is complex and actually has a lot of heart.  In “Development Arrested,” when Michael finally realizes how much he’s sold out for the family, he chooses his son and decides to leave them for good.  Despite the excitement over the revived series and a cliffhanger, I thought this would have been the perfect way to end the show.  Michael is one of my favorite TV characters, but I do have a problem with his sexual indiscretion.  While he does things that are arguably worse in the name of the Bluth Company, those moral failures actually have relevance and significance to the story.  It’s harder to understand him when he simply has sex with someone like the notoriously dishonest Maggie Lizer (Julia-Louis Dreyfus) for no other reason than that she arouses him.  It makes it seem odd when he judges Ann (Mae Whitman) for her prudishness.  Oh well, now I’m starting to see why Mitchell Hurwitz says he’s actually the craziest of the Bluths.            
     Despite my love of Michael, my actual favorite character is The Narrator (Ron Howard).  He’s a bit of a base breaker, as I’ve talked to people who say they would have liked the show if not for him, but I think he really makes the show shine brighter.  While some may say this was borrowed from Alec Baldwin’s soporific narration from The Royal Tenenbaums, it’s not exactly true.  Also, whereas Alec Baldwin’s narration came off as lazy exposition, the narration in AD enhances the humor and is timed along with it.  One of the reasons it is funny is because the narrator is a character himself.  He snarks, editorializes and occasionally has some petty hangups of his own.  While the narration is omnipresent, I have no problem with it.  It’s a unique stylistic property, and I also enjoy the multi-camera style and the lack of a laugh-track. 
     One of the reasons why I don’t understand why this show bombed is that there’s a joke for everyone in this show, although that’s not always a good thing.  For every example of dry wit or well-executed quirkiness, there’s a lame pun or double entendre.  Unfortunately, a lot of this type of humor comes from GOB, whom I love.  Some characters have lame puns for names, and this seems to be a trademark for Hurwitz, who used this to annoying effect in the disappointing Sit Down, Shut Up.  Sometimes the double entendres are so bad, they’re not even double entendres (at one point Ann is seen with a camel while announcer says she has a “camel toe”).  Another type of “joke” that this show often perpetrates is a pet peeve of mine in mainstream comedies: the shouted line that isn’t funny, but it’s easy to remember, so everyone runs around repeating it everywhere.    
Comedy doesn’t tend to be my favorite genre, and that’s because a lot of hip, quirky comedies end up having these types of jokes I find really annoying.  Often whether I like a comedy is not based on the absence of this type of humor, but whether or not there are enough good jokes to compensate for the bad ones.  Fortunately, Arrested Development is one of these shows.  There are so many hilarious lines in it that I cannot possibly list them here.  Unfortunately, I know this show by heart and I’ve watched it enough that I think I’ve ferreted out and memorized all the subtle funny jokes, so now whenever I watch an episode, I tend to notice the crap.  That’s one thing that makes me a little excited for the renewal.  I want to see some fresh material from this team.      
      Politically, Arrested Development is actually refreshing.  While most shows seem biased toward liberalism, this show seems anything but.  While the Bluths are often described as an analogue to the Bushes, and the show revolves around mocking the War on Terror, liberals get their fair share of skewering.  Michael’s twin sister Lindsay (Portia de Rossi) and her ambiguously gay husband Tobias seem to be parodies of hypocritical, pampered limousine liberals.  Lindsay seems to have little genuine belief in her liberal causes, and it seems to be mostly a product of her rebellion against her parents, as is her marriage to Tobias, who for once in television history is a closet homosexual who is not homophobic.  They are often negligent and far too permissive toward their daughter Maeby (Alia Shawkat), who has no respect for them.  Particularly refreshing is the episode “Burning Love,” which seems like it’s going to end up being a typically preachy anti-gun episode.  In the end it simply uses the scenario for comedy while poking fun at both sides.  It’s ironic that few Republicans seemed to havewatched this show, but I’ll never understand the tastes of other conservatives.  With the post-Obama radicalization of the Democratic Party, however, I fear the writers of this show might not be so balanced.  It’s one of the main reasons I’m ambivalent about Season 4.
     On May 26 the show will be revived as a Netfilx Original.  I can’t say I’m not excited, but as I said before I have my doubts.  With seven years between this and the show’s cancellation, it is reasonable to surmise that the writing will not be as fresh.  While the show’s marketing was blamed for its poor ratings, I don’t think that the potentially annoying gimmicks that Netflix is trying are going to help appeal to anyone other than hardcore fans.  Another reason I’m doubtful is that, while Arrested Development was always funny, I was starting to see sharksign in the third season.  Episodes and humor were becoming more forced and there was definite flanderization.  For example, Tobias’ latent homosexuality wasn’t as big a factor, and by Season 3 he wasn’t even subtle about it.  Buster started out as being a reluctant prisoner of his dominant mother, then showing a suppressed Oedipus Complex, and finally his perverse attraction to his mother wasn’t even a matter of question.  It’s just one thing to consider, since I normally don’t like it when comedies sacrifice characterization for laughs.  I’m sure the new season will be fun, but it’s a risk that may not be worth it.  It’s always bad when a great show is prematurely cancelled, but it’s still better than having a show live way past its time to the point where it becomes a soulless, unfunny shell of its former self that makes you forget how great it once was.   




SEASON 4 UPDATE

     Well, probably the most noticeable thing about the new season is how complex it is.  The entire season is told in one period of time from different points of view.  The show always had intertwining story arcs, but nothing like this.  I admit it was very clever, but it seems to lack focus.  I might have to watch it multiple times to get a lot of the jokes.  I know I missed a lot on the first viewing. 
    In Neo-Simpsons form, the show seems to be increasingly fascinated with gratuitous celebrity cameos.  One of the first scenes in the new season features Seth Rogen and Kristen Wiig as younger versions of George Sr. and Lucille.  They are terribly cast.  Neither of them look a thing like the two characters, although Wiig is at least trying at a Jessica Walter impression. Even worse, the show was previously satisfied to have Jeffrey Tambor and Jessica Walter play the roles with different clothes and hairstyles.  It’s especially flawed when you consider that these new flashbacks take place during the same time periods as the old ones. 
     I’m happy they’re taking risks and trying new things with the writing, but a slight problem is that all of the characters are on their own so we don’t get much of them interacting with each other.  The worst part of Season 4 was that Michael and George Michael were stripped of any likability they ever had in the previous seasons.  As I said, Michael is my favorite character for his straight man persona.  It allows his to be a foil for his family, and his snarky, realistic comments are the funniest part of the show.  Though there were plenty of jokes in this season, it lacked Michael's usually funny dialogue because Michael is now just as fucked up and corrupt as any other character in this show.  He actually becomes annoying since his appeal is supposed to be the opposite of what he’s depicted as in the new episodes.  Michael’s role as a protagonist could have provided the complex storyline with some focus, instead of making it seem chaotic.  He’s one of my favorite TV characters, but this status does not apply to him in Season 4.
     Another problem I expressed concern over was the politics of the show.  The political atmosphere has changed significantly after the show’s cancellation in 2006.  Since Obama’s election, whatever vestige of sanity in the mind of activist liberals is about as nonexistent as the Easter Bunny.  Considering the increasing rabidity of TV programs and that conservatives with my tastes are a rare breed, I was fearing the worst.  One bad sign is that a major arc revolves around adulterous Republican politician Herbert Love (Terry Crews), who is transparently based on Herman Cain (with maybe some Ron Paul thrown in).  This is tempered by the fact that some of the liberal characters he exchanges words with are not really sympathetic by any stretch of the imagination.  A few passive-aggressive swipes at Christianity are thrown in.  One joke reveals that Tobias appeared in a pro-life video as a fetus (it’s a funny idea, and I admit these things can get really corny).  Fortunately, that’s as far as it goes on that issue.  Most disturbingly, Lindsay seems to come out of the closet as a conservative strawman at the end of her arc.  I always loved how she was a refreshing example of the opposite.  Still, I shouldn’t complain about that too much.  It could have worse.  It could have a LOT worse.        
     It may not have the appeal of the first wave, but the plot is engaging and even ends on a few intriguing cliffhangers.  I recommend watching the first seasons before checking this one out, though.  I'm not sure if it's worth it.  I've been trying to rewatch these new episodes by I keep hitting a block when I realize that each episode focuses a lot on this annoying/tedious new character I don't give a crap about.    
 

UPDATE 2   
 Ok, so apparently the idea of a lifelong limousine liberal's running a successful Republican campaign based on a hardline immigration stance turned out to be freakishly prescient.  But they're probably going to get drunk on that call and go way too far in the politics in the hopefully aborted Season 5.
  

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Silent Era Movies Ranked




Watching silent movies is interesting.  The visual effects that we take for granted were actually conceived pretty early in the game.  It’s surprising how much was done before something as basic as sound effects.  It’s interesting to see how the actors told the story without the benefit of dialogue, and intertitles were used sparingly.  Still, silent films lack the dialogue that is part of why I love movies.


7. Battleship Potemkin
1925
D: Sergei Eisenstein
**********
Excellent and revolutionary cinematography, but it really is sullied by its own propaganda.


6. Nosferatu
1922
D: F.W. Murmau
**********
Although I’m sure this was a very scary movie in the day, I can’t really be creeped out that much by it.  Max Schreck is great in it, and it has some clever visual effects.  I thought the score was atmospheric, but it got inappropriately loud during the tense moments.  I still haven’t seen a movie that does full justice to the book.

5. The Man Who Laughs
1928
D: Paul Leni
**********
Conrad Veidt is great in this role, and his makeup is memorable.  This design was the inspiration for the Joker, and if you look at the earlier artwork of the Joker, you can really tell.  Also has some good performances from some quirky actors.


4. Metropolis
1927
D: Fritz Lang
**********
Amazing visuals and a compelling story.  The effects actually hold up well.


3. The General
1926
D: Buster Keaton, Clyde Bruckman
**********
Great visual humor and performance by Buster Keaton.


2. A Trip to the Moon
1902
D: Georges Melies
**********
Amazing visuals for the time period.  It’s almost unbelievable that it came out so early.  Also has a sense of humor, too.


1. The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari
1920
D: Robert Wiene
**********
Introduced many narrative tools we take for granted, like the twist ending.  The expressionist visuals are great and the movie really holds up.





 1930's >>