Friday, December 9, 2016

10th Anniversaries, Pt. 1



 
300
2006
D: Zack Snyder
**********
Pros: Some Witty Moments of Dialogue, Some Good Fight Choreography
Cons: Poorly Thought Out Moral Themes, Protagonists, Action Style

       Today is the 10th anniversary of one of my least favorite films, so I might as well review it.  With Zack Snyder’s helming the consistently mediocre DC Cinematic Universe, everybody refers to this and his remake of Dawn of the Dead as a promising start to a disappointing career.  I, however, believe his movies have improved since these two, even if they’re still not particularly good.  In addition to being a very tacky movie, 300 was rather popular among many Republicans because of its supposed relevance to the war in Iraq. 
       The battle of Thermopylae is a difficult event to adapt into a modern story.  On one hand it was a valiant stand against a superior force that influenced the direction of Western Civilization.  On the other, Sparta was an inhuman totalitarian state.  Even World War II movies about Germans, who weren’t all corrupted by Nazi ideology, are easier to write sympathetically.  A more complex attempt to humanize this conflict could be seen in Steven Pressfield’s Gates of Fire, but that ends up being rather awkward (particularly the story arc of Rooster, a helot who has every reason not to fight alongside the Spartans but does anyway).  Unfortunately, many people don’t seem too concerned over this.  Frank Miller’s does not see conflicted in his celebration of their strength, probably due to his being influenced by Objectivism.
       And the first five minutes give us all the reason we need to root against the Spartans.  The introduction covers the childhood of a young Leonidas (Tyler Neitzel) as he faces his brutal childhood training.  In addition to the brutal combat conditioning of the Spartans throughout their whole lives, the movie makes no effort to hide one of the society’s most inhuman customs, the murder of “imperfect” infants.  This moment made the movie’s popularity among conservatives even more confusing, because I was always under the impression we were against this kind of thing.  This all occurs while the narrator, Dilios (David Wenham), romantically pontificates on how awesome the Spartans are for their dedication to martial skills.  The problem with this is that a society that values militarism above all else without much to fight for sets itself up for weakness.  It’s important to have a strong military as we do, but we don’t want to be North Korea, which actually is weaker than the more cosmopolitan South Korea.  Also, Athens had comparable might without having to depend on intimidation of a volatile slave class to provide basic needs.  A balanced, free society is a strong society.
 
Um-
      As king, Leonidas (Gerard Butler) is accosted by a Persian messenger (Peter Mensah), who requests that he give King Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro) tribute.  Leonidas turns him down and then panders to some in the audience by saying that the “boy-loving” Athenians did so too (institutionalized pederasty was a tool of unit cohesion in real life Sparta).  With the permission of his wife Gorgo (Lena Headey), he murders the messenger and his bodyguards by dumping them down a well.  The corrupt Ephor who manages the Oracle (Kelly Craig) advises against war because he’s under the Persians.  This is probably a reflection of Miller’s more secularist hang-ups.  The same applies to corrupt politician Theron (Dominic Green).  Without official support, Leonidas departs to the eponymous Hot Gates with a small force of 300 soldiers, plus a few Arcadians.  Before he leaves he makes love to Gorgo.  While it is one of the more justified sex scenes in a movie, there was a moment that got laughs.
      In an early skirmish Stelios (Michael Fassbender) dispatches a small group of Persians.  When Canadian politician Tyrone Benskin tells him “Our arrows will blot out the sun,” he replies with the iconic “Then we will fight in the shade.”  An expatriate Spartan hunchback Ephialtes (Andrew Tiernan) offers his help.  Leonidas, sympathetic to his request now that he’s too old to be fair game for eugenic slaughter, tells him that he would only be a burden on the battlefield.  He gives him a reasonable offer to be useful in other ways, which is counterintuitive considering Sparta’s culture.  The heartbroken Ephialtes offers his services to Xerxes in the middle of the latter’s lesbian/furry orgy.  This seems to be consistent with Miller’s Randian attitude that physical weakness is somehow a sign of corruption. 
        After some projected fighting, Leonidas goes alone to parlay with Xerxes.  In one of his smarter and funnier moments, he points out that if he gets assassinated the council will certainly approve the needed war.  He rejects Xerxes’ demands by invoking empty platitudes of freedom (yeah, tell that to the Helots, who are never mentioned in this movie).  Still, his suspicion of Xerxes’ megalomania is healthy.    
      Meanwhile, Theron tells Gorgo that he will convince the council to support Leonidas if she submits to sex with him.  When she submits, he brutally does so, telling her “This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.”  When he ends up backstabbing her after she delivers the most phoned-in, generic freedom speech I’ve ever heard at the council hearing, she stabs him while saying that same line to him.  Luckily, his bribe money just spills out, and the council is convinced that the war is just.  So the lesson is that if some politician objects to war, he must be on the enemy’s payroll, and you can murder him on the floor.  That’s how republics work, after all.
     While the Spartans can be judged by their actions, the Persians are mostly otherized by their appearance.  Xerxes is flamboyantly effeminate, and soldiers are dressed in exaggerated Middle Eastern trappings (though they actually look pretty cool).  In classic form, the villains are much better dressed than the Spartans, who are simply dressed in diapers and capes.  The ninja-like Immortals are my favorite design.  It gets particularly amusing when the narration exposits that the Persians then “used their magic,” and it cuts to these guys' throwing bombs. 
It was the best coordination of narration for comic effect I've seen outside Arrested Development.
In addition to this, some of their soldiers are depicted as almost non-human.  There’s a large, mindless, ghoul called the Über Immortal (Robert Maillet), and a deformed fatman who executes failed Persian generals with his severed arm axes.  Despite this, the Persians seem more like America than Iraq in context: a large cosmopolitan nation invading a small, tyrannical one.  Seems some fans got this backwards.  At one point, the movie attempts to pass judgment on Persia for having a draft, because that’s so much worse than training boys to be killing machines from birth.
      In contrast, the Spartans are depicted as physically perfect male specimens in a state of near undress (period accurate armor would be more interesting).  Critics on the Left have accused the movie of a sort of homoeroticism that contrasts with its apparent homophobia.  Fans on the Right have defended this as idealization.  This is an interesting reversal of roles in regards to depictions of the human form in other comics.  Usually, the Left cries objectification of female characters, while dismissing male equivalents as idealization, whereas the Right disagrees.  Funny and convenient how the rules change with this movie/comic.  Doesn’t matter who’s right, the movie sucks anyway.
      “But, Scorpio,” you say, “maybe you’re taking this too seriously.  It’s just a movie.”  Ok, fine, I guess if you like this for subjective, fun-based reasons, that’s ok.  Can’t argue with that.  Still, this movie does not appeal  to my tastes enough to even grant it the status of a guilty pleasure.  The biggest stylistic problem this movie has is how the action is edited.  While some of the fights are well choreographed, they suffer mainly as a result of Snyder’s affinity for fight scenes that slow down and speed up for no good reason.  Usually you can slow down at dramatic points in the fight that make sense, but when this is done wrong, it ruins the immersive effect of the action.  In 300 this is done in a way that makes it look like every hack movie that came out a year after The Matrix.  Fortunately, only Snyder and Timur Bekmambetov insist on doing fight scenes that make you feel like you’re trying to get up to highway speeds with a bad transmission.  Oddly enough, the trailer used the slow motion more consistently for better effect (and was set to a good song).  I feel the same way about this trope that most people seem to feel about shaky-cam.  In fact, I was one of the few people who was relieved by the action scenes in Man of Steel.  The cartoonishly exaggerated CG blood didn’t help, either.  Also, the cheesy performances are a waste of a good cast.   
       Not to say that the movie doesn’t have it strengths.  The blue screen look, inspired by Sin City, is interesting and it foreshadowed one of Snyder’s visual strengths.  Despite how inept a director he is, his movies tend to be quite pretty to look at.  Tyler Bates’ energetic score may not fit the setting, but it’s definitely fun to listen to.  The movie is also not without its good lines; the Spartans are very witty, even their real-life counterparts inspired the word “laconic” for a reason.
          It was interesting how this movie marked a turning point in how bad movies could be; bad movies before 2007 just don’t seem to compare to the ones made afterward.  300 could be a watershed moment.  My main problem, however, is that it is one of the most morally inverted movies I have seen.  It invites one to ignore principle and root for its protagonists primarily based on their ability to fight, as opposed to what they fight for.  It’s might makes right.  One of the reasons I love Gladiator, in addition to being a much better movie than this, is its prevailing theme is one of might for right (not to say it’s without its own flaws).  This, along with the movie’s gauche nature and supposed conservative appeal made it like the Donald Trump of movies.  Having the integrity to stand up for your beliefs and fight for them is great, but the ability to fight means nothing if we forget what we’re fighting for.   
      

THERON: It is the law, my lord. The Spartan army must not go to war.
LEONIDAS:  Nor shall it. I've issued no such orders. I'm here, just taking a stroll, stretching my legs. These, uh, 300 men are my personal bodyguard.

PERSIAN: A thousand nations of the Persian empire will descend upon you. Our arrows will blot out the sun!
STELIOS: Then we will fight in the shade.

XERXES: You Greeks take pride in your logic. I suggest you employ it. Consider the beautiful land you so vigorously defend. Picture it reduced to ash at my whim! Consider the fate of your women!
LEONIDAS: Clearly you don't know our women! I might as well have marched them up here, judging by what I've seen.

LEONIDAS: Captain, I leave you in charge.
CAPTAIN: But, sire…
LEONIDAS: Relax, old friend. If they assassinate me, all of Sparta goes to war. Pray they're that stupid. Pray we're that lucky. [bites apple and talks with his mouth full] Besides, there's no reason we can't be civil, is there?

The Persians have demanded that Lenidas gives in now that the battle is lost.
DILIOS: His helmet is stifling. [Leonidas takes off helmet and drops it]  His shield is heavy. [He drops his shield]
PERSIAN GENERAL: Your spear.
LEONIDAS: [To Ephialtes] You are Ephialtes.  May you live forever.
PERSIAN GENERAL: Leonidas, your spear.
[Leonidas drops spear and bows, then signals to Stelios to make one final attack]
DILIOS: His helmet was stifling, it narrowed his vision. And he must see far. His shield was heavy. It threw him off balance. And his target is far away. [Leonidas throws spear at Xerxes, grazing his face]

DILIOS: [before leaving] Sire, any message?
LEONIDAS: For the queen?  [gives him his wolf fang pendant]  None that need to be spoken.

DILIOS: Just there the barbarians huddle, sheer terror gripping tight their hearts with icy fingers... knowing full well what merciless horrors they suffered at the swords and spears of three hundred. Yet they stare now across the plain at *ten thousand* Spartans commanding thirty thousand free Greeks!

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Christopher Nolan Movies Ranked



I’m adding a new feature on my blog in which I rank directors’ movies.  It’s an opportunity to complement my Favorite Movies by Year while filling in some holes.  There are a few little stipulations:
-I’m of course limiting this to movies I have seen
-I think the minimum will be four movies per director
-Some of the movies will have the directorial duties outsourced to someone else.  If I am led to believe that a filmmaker was the primary creative force behind a movie, I will include it on his list.

I’ll be starting with Christopher Nolan, one of the best directors working today.  Not only is he a skilled storyteller who can weave complex themes into still-thrilling storylines, he’s an excellent visual artist.  In an age when all movies look the same, Nolan’s films are refreshingly distinctive in appearance, partially due to his insistence on practical effects whenever possible.  He's equally adept at neo-noir mysteries and genre blockbusters.  My only complaint is that female characters are usually not represented as strongly in his work.  He has a great record, and the only two movies of his I don’t like still get 5/10 ratings from me.  The bad news is those are his last two movies.  Still, I have high hopes for Dunkirk.      



2012
**********

A huge disappointment considering how great the previous two movies were.  While the cinematography was great, the story left a lot to be desired, and Bane was poorly handled in the adaptation.  While the other two movies did a great job reimagining Batman in a unique way without sacrificing the spirit of the franchise, this one missed the point and was practically a Batman movie in name only.  I would have liked it if it were simply titled Christopher Nolan Action Movie #4.  Still, it has some pretty cheesy moments to boot.  I love how Batman’s bad leg and back are brushed off and forgotten about halfway through the movie.  That’s how you handle vulnerability.  Now I know how Boomers/Gen-Xers felt when they saw Return of the Jedi.



9. Interstellar
2014
**********

While it started out strong, it eventually succumbed to clichés, stilted dialogue, irrational character actions (like losing 20 years on Planet Time Warp because they didn’t feel like traveling a couple weeks to the farther planet) and a tedious third act.  Still, while Nolan’s writing isn’t as fresh as it used to be, this and Dark Knight Rises demonstrate that he can still direct the hell out of a movie.  The practical effects are fantastic and refreshing, and the parts that are supposed to be thrilling are thrilling.  I also like pipe organs.  The call to action on space exploration is a good message.  It also refreshingly depicts Matt Damon as a backstabbing coward who gets his comeuppance.  Too bad it’s this movie which has the strongest female role I’ve seen a Nolan movie.

 

7. Doodlebug
1997
**********
A short, sweet little film with a darkly surreal/humorous twist.


8. Insomnia
2002

**********
While being mostly faithful to the plot of the 1997 Norwegian original, it’s different enough in its interpretation that comparison is difficult.  It’s a little more dramatic and convoluted than the cold, simple original, but there are a couple improvements.  One is that the protagonist is not a creepy ephebophile, which is something that did not add anything to the original.  I also thought that Robin Williams’ villain was more interesting and charismatic than original’s version.




 

6. The Prestige
2006
**********
Great style and a mysterious plot.  I particularly liked the tense rivalry between Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman’s characters. An additional plus was the presence of David Bowie as Nikola Tesla.  Scarlett Johansson’s character, however, was mostly an object of affection.


 




5. Batman Begins
2005
**********

A triumphant and stylish reboot that proved that Batman is relevant as ever.  Does a good job faithfully interpreting the character in a uniquely down-to-earth fashion.  Great score, too.







4. Following
1998
**********

A great neo-noir mystery that with an effective non-linear plot that will leave you guessing until the clever twist. 









3. Memento
2000
**********
Nolan’s first mainstream hit cleverly uses a backwards story to build up to a big twist.  Original and entertaining.








2. Inception
2010
**********
A truly engaging and cerebral thrill ride that reminded me of why I love movies in the first place.  Nolan effectively uses dream logic to show off the strengths of his style.  Another great score from Hans Zimmer, as well.






1. The Dark Knight
2008
**********
Nolan deserves credit for reimagining Batman in a thrilling, gritty, realistic universe and making it work while adding cerebral themes about human nature.  It has one of the best villains in movie history.  2007 was a frustrating year because I had to listen to people talk about how awesome "Transformers" and 300 were, so I found it refreshing that this time around all the hype was given to a movie that actually deserved it.












Improvement Graph 
Averate Rating: 7.7



[Note: I was kinda sleepy when I posted this, so it might have some typos]





Sunday, November 6, 2016

Obligatory 2016 Election Thinkpiece


In the Mouth of Madness
1994
D: John Carpenter
**********
Pros: Good Ideas, Good Cast, Some Good Atmosphere
Cons: Not as Much Focus as Carpenter’s Other Movies


NOTE: This was written before the election, and I was laboring under the assumption that there was no chance Trump could win.  I was also expecting the Left to not react so insanely.  In fact, the appeal of the movie is even greater in the light of their current behavior.  Especially with the part about people's turning into beasts and rampaging like crazy people.  As it stands, laughter still is the most sane response.

      This has been a frustrating year.  Both political parties have nominated their worst possible candidates, and as a result people feel helpless.  The world seems to have turned into some kind of surrealist joke, and there’s nothing we can do about it.  Trump’s rise is particularly frustrating, as he is literally running as a TV strawman of a Republican.  Many conservatives are now seeing a world in which every cartoonish stereotype concocted by their opponents is not only true but tacitly endorsed by their own party.  It’s like reality itself has been warped by some guy with bad hair.
He has risen to power by manipulating fear, and his constituency seems to prefer his clownish posturing to facts.  A movie that people are often invoking as a comparison to this insanity is Idiocracy.  I’d like to submit John Carpenter’s homage to H.P. Lovecraft for consideration.
     The third part of Carpenter’s “Apocalypse Trilogy” (after The Thing and Prince of Darkness), In the Mouth of Madness doesn’t seem to be one of his more popular movies, but that’s a rather unfair assessment.  It’s a movie that uses disturbing ideas for its fright, rather than straightforward thrills.  It also borrows many themes from Lovecraft’s work.  It has similar tropes, and the title is clearly based off that of At the Mountains of Madness (and possibly The Shadow over Innsmouth).  This film’s reality-warping plot, which questions the control we have over our own fates, lacks the simplicity of Carpenter’s other films, so his directorial style may not be shining as brightly here.  Some might call it a bit disjointed.  I think that’s why people did not take to this one as well.  On a side note, there is one pretentious line about religion, but it seems to be in line with Lovecraft’s themes.
      The movie’s protagonist is insurance investigator/professional skeptic John Trent (Sam Neill), who is commissioned by publisher Jackson Harglow (Charlton Heston) to find his company’s bestselling horror author Sutter Cane (Jürgen Prochnow).  Trent believes this to be a massive publicity stunt, as well as the rumors that Cane’s readers often go insane or transform into monsters.  Things begin to get strange when he is attacked by Cane’s agent, who has gone insane from reading one his books.  After solving a subtle puzzle in Cane’s book covers, Trent locates Hobb’s End, a fictional town featured in many of the author’s works.  Accompanied by Cane’s editor, Linda Styles (Julie Carmen), he drives to the town. 
        They encounter numerous strange and frightening occurrences on their trip, including hallucinations of monsters and a time distortion.  Linda goes to the town’s menacing church to confront Cane, but is driven insane by his book.  Meanwhile, Trent, fleeing from hostile townsfolk, finds himself in a time loop which only ends when he wrecks his nice Cadillac and resigns to confronting Cane himself.  While I’m going off on a tangent, I like how the time loop represents just how helpless we can feel.  History seems to be cyclical, and sometimes I question how much a person can mean if we can’t really make a difference.  It doesn’t matter how much determination or integrity we have, nothing can change until the hive mind of humanity decides it’s good and ready for it.  Until then we’re doomed to spin our wheels until we wreck our nice Cadillacs.  I’m sorry, things are just getting to me.  I’d better relax and get back to the plot…
OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-

…Anyway, when Trent arrives at the church, he is informed by Cane that he is merely a character in his final book, a tool to ensure its publication.  He shows Trent a portal through which he can go back to the real world and tears open his own face to reveal a rift in reality through which his monstrous masters exit.  Trent is pursued by these Lovecraftian beasts through a corridor when he inexplicably finds himself in a seemingly normal environment.  Like a layered dream, Cane then toys with Trent’s perception of reality.  At one point, he tells Trent his favorite color is blue, and Trent finds himself in a completely blue world, much to his horror.  Just like in this wretched election cycle, even the silly moments are frightening simply because they demonstrate our own powerlessness.
John Carpenter tried to warn us about Hollywood's overdependence on digital color filtering, but we wouldn't listen.
      Trent finally finds himself in the real world and, after getting directions to town from a paperboy (Hayden Christensen), attempts to plead with Harglow not to publish the book.  Harglow informs him that the book has already been published and that a movie is coming out soon.  In addition to all this, he also tells Trent that he has no idea who Linda is.  Despairing, Trent attacks a reader who seems to be succumbing to the book’s power and is sent to a mental institution (where he scores a hit to one of the guards’ crotch) and is evaluated by Dr. Wrenn (David Warner).  Eventually, the apocalypse happens as planned, and Trent exits the unguarded asylum until he finds a theater playing In the Mouth of Madness.  The reality-bending nature of this film comes full circle when he watches previous scenes of himself in the movie and resigns to laughter.
      While In the Mouth of Madness has great atmosphere, it doesn’t quite demonstrate Carpenter’s stylistic strengths as well as some of his other movies.  Still, there are plenty of creepy moments.  Frightening images come at you in moderation, and there’s some nice restraint in their execution.  The chase down the corridor with the swarm of monsters provides only glimpses of the beings and one split second focused shot of them, making the scene effective on a more subliminal level.  The movie’s score, by Carpenter and Jim Lang, is not the most memorable in the former’s movies, but it fits the atmosphere well.  The main theme is a controversial use of rock, but unsurprisingly I like it and I think it’s oddly fitting.  The cast is very good and it includes John Glover, Bernie Casey, Frances Bay, Wilhelm von Homburg, and John Carpenter veteran Peter Jason. 
      Despite all the undeserved disdain, this is a great existential metahorror film from a master of the craft.  I think that Carpenter’s most underrated movie might just have a cathartic appeal to those of us who are frustrated by the reality-butchering absurdity of the 2016 election year (then again
Bernie/Trump supporters those of us to buy into populist delusion might prefer Carpenter’s most overrated movie).  At the very least, it should teach us that if we can’t control something for the time being, sometimes the best thing to do is to sit back and laugh. 
Like when I found out I couldn't find a Region 1 DVD of this movie on Amazon.



TRENT: You're waiting to hear about my 'them', aren't you?
DR. WREN: Your what?
TRENT: My 'them'. Every paranoid schizophrenic has one; a 'them', a 'they', an 'it'. And you want to hear about my 'them', don't you?
DR. WREN: I want to know how you got here.
TRENT: Things are turning to shit out there, aren't they?

TRENT: A word of advice. You want to pull a scam, don't make your wife a partner. And if you do, don't fuck around behind her back.

LINDA: A reality is just what we tell each other it is.

TRENT: God’s not supposed to be a hack horror writer.

CANE: Did I ever tell you my favorite color is blue?

TRENT: Every species can smell its own extinction. The last ones left won't have a pretty time with it. In ten years, maybe less, the human race will just be a bedtime story for their children. A myth, nothing more.

CANE: I think therefore you are.

GUARD: Do you read Sutter Cane?
[Dr. Wrenn just glares at him]

TRENT: This book is going to drive everyone absolutely mad!
HARGLOW: Well, let’s hope so.  The movie comes out next month.

TRENT: Like the book?
READER: I love it.
TRENT: Good.  Then this shouldn’t come as a surprise. [attacks him with an axe]