Friday, January 23, 2015

Oscar Nominations and Snubs - 2015



It’s that time of year again.  Insert obligatory disclaimer concerning the paradox of how little regard we have for the Academy Awards and yet how we cannot stop talking about them.

BEST PICTURE
It seems that the Oscars is going back to its old tricks.  For a while it was nominating movies people actually wanted to see, but it seems to be reverting back to nominating aesthetically insignificant biopics and cause movies.  I’ve only seen one movie on this list (Grand Budapest Hotel, which is deserving), but I intend to see American Sniper and Birdman when I get the opportunity.  I think Calvary was a snub.  I'm happy Noah was not nominated.

BEST PICTURE
Wes Anderson is one of the most original and distinctive directors working today, and I would be upset if he did not get recognized for it.  I believe the snub of this category was Christopher Nolan.  I had my issues with Interstellar, but it demonstrated that he can still direct the hell out of a film.

BEST ACTOR
This doesn’t sound very objective, but I haven’t seen any of these movies and yet I’m still rooting for Michael Keaton just for being the best live-action Batman.

BEST ANIMATED FILM
A lot of people have been complaining about The LEGO Movie snub, but I find it understandable considering that the one thing that solidified it as a truly good movie as a opposed to just a surprisingly fun one was a live-action sequence.  Visually beautiful as Book of Life was, it was an understandable snub because the movie itself wasn’t that good.  If there was an award for Best Animation (which would be far more legitimate than this ghetto award), it should go to that or Boxtrolls.  I haven’t seen Song of the Sea or Princess Kaguya, but Boxtrolls is the best nominee I have seen.

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
Probably the most useful award in introducing people to obscure movies they otherwise would not have seen.  Introducing The Lives of Others to people by awarding it over Pan’s Labyrinth is one of the few things I’ve got to hand to the Academy.  It’s still a ghetto award, and I don’t agree with awarding these movies based on their American releases as opposed to recognizing them in time for people to go see them in theaters.  I’ve heard Ida is excellent and I intend to see it when I can.

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
A surprisingly good group despite couple bad snubs.  Alexandre Desplat’s score for Grand Budapest Hotel has a nice folk charm.  His score for The Imitation Game is also very good.  My money is on his winning the award.  Hans Zimmer’s score for Interstellar is awesome, but suspiciously familiar at times.  Johann Johannson’s score for The Theory of Everything seems to be the weakest of the bunch.  Mr. Turner (Gary Yershon) is okay.  The frustrating snubs of the year in this category are Steven Price’s excellent work for Fury, which I think is even better than his Oscar-winning score for Gravity, and Clint Mansell's score for Noah.  

BEST ORIGINAL SONG
While most of the nominations seem solid, this category is the biggest screw-up of the year.  The Best Original Song award broke from tradition the last couple of years by awarding songs that actually deserved it for the first time ever, but now the Academy is back to its old ways.  I’m going to be the bad guy here, but I do not understand why everyone likes “Everything is Awesome.”  It’s a bland and phoned-in song, and there are much better happy songs out there.  I’m pretty sure it’s supposed to have an ironic Stylistic Suck appeal, but that should obviously disqualify it for an award based on earnest musical achievement.  I’ve always thought this award was a complete and utter joke, but if this song wins, it would be a new low even by the standards of this category.  It’s the song I will be rooting against.
     The other songs in the category are also predictably underwhelming except for John Legend/Common’s “Glory.”  With the exception of that song, this years award was a travesty.  My money’s on this song just because of politics, but it’s still the most deserving of the nominees.  C’mon Hollywood white guilt, don’t let me down now.  Funny though, I think “The Apology Song” from Book of Life would have been a good choice due to its ethnic appeal and the fact that it’s far better than most of the nominees.  Oh well, Hollywood white guilt can only focus on one race at a time, and this is apparently Black Person Year.  “The Yellow Flicker Beat” from Hunger Games was also a blatant snub.
      My nomination for the biggest snub of the year in this category is honestly…My Little Pony: Equestria Girls - Rainbow Rocks.  I don’t want to look like I’m giving any quarter to the terrible idea that was Equestria Girls, but the songs in it that are sung by The Dazzlings are actually really good (especially “Battle”) and far more deserving than any of the nominees.  The movie probably didn’t warrant a theatrical release, but that does qualify its songs for nominations.  Maybe it’s the Academy Awards bias against awarding songs for movies that were not too critically acclaimed even for awards in which that’s moot.  The Oscars has also shown a blatant bias against villain songs (the other songs in Rainbow Rocks kinda suck).                

BEST SOUND MIXING
This is usually an award no one gives a crap about, but I really think the sound effects in Captain America: The Winter Soldier helped its action have impact.  That was a snub.  Probably rooting for Interstellar among the nominees.

BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN
Definitely rooting for Interstellar or Grand Budapest Hotel.

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
I’m rooting for Grand Budapest Hotel, but Interstellar was a snub.
 
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
Under normal circumstances, I would root for Interstellar for its excellent practical effects in a time where all movies look the same due to CGI, but I think Guardians of the Galaxy deserves an award just for pulling off a talking animal in live-action.  Captain America: The Winter Soldier also got nominated I presume because of its excellent action, but that would be a different award…a Best Action/Best Stunts award that should exist. 

Upcoming Movies - 2015



A list of the movies coming out this year that I’m looking forward to and those I’m not.  I’m afraid I’ll have to wait until next year for Zootopia and Captain America: Civil War, though.  I think I can be forgiven for not listing smaller movies that are not hyped as much until they come out.


MOVIES I INTEND TO SEE

Feb. 6
D: The Wachowskis
I like a good space opera, and this one has both Sean Bean and awesome (but sadly not fat) dragon people.  The trailer doesn’t look that good, but I’ve always found the Wachowskis to be fun and they’ve yet to let me down.  Sue me, I liked Matrix: Revolutions and Speed Racer.  It was bad.  I never thought I'd say this, but it was actually more boring than Avatar.  (2/10)

May 15
D: George Miller
It seems to have CGI, but it’s well executed.  The cinematography and design look good.  The movie has a great B-Movie aesthetic to it.  I usually think that these 80’s nostalgia films are a bad idea, but the trailer looks excellent

June 19
D: Pete Docter
It’s been five years since Pixar released a great movie, and that was followed by one mediocre film, one decent film and one middling one.  It completely took a break last year in order to recharge its creative juices, and more power to them for that.  They’re about due for another truly original film, which this seem to be.  The trailer looks hilarious.

Hotel Transylvania 2
September 25
D: Genndy Tartakovsky
Probably for the same reason a conservative might attend a gay friend's wedding.  I don't necessarily approve, but I want to support for Tartakovsky.  Also because I like the werewolves because I'm a piece of furry trash.

Spectre
Nov. 6
D: Sam Mendes
The Daniel Craig Bonds seem to have the best track record of the series (3 for 0, and yes, I liked Quantum of Solace).  It will be exciting to see the franchise going back to its roots with better hindsight.  Still, I’m starting to think that Chrisoph Waltz’s villains are getting played out, great as he is.  This fan-made trailer is pretty good.

Nov. 13
D: Quentin Tarantino
It’s a Quentin Tarantino film, so I’m obviously already sold.  Still, I wish he’d branch out more considering he already made a Western last time.  I’d like to see him make a Buck Rogers-like space opera.

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay 2
Nov. 20
D: Francis Lawrence
I liked the previous ones, so I’m seeing this.  I’m hurt about Philip Seymour Hoffman, but look at the bright side: he gets an above-average tribute movie.

Dec. 18
D: J.J. Abrams
Despite the easily-mocked excitement over this trailer, it doesn’t show much aside from the potentially intriguing stormtrooper.  I’m open to the idea of its being a good movie, but then again the new Star Trek movies aren’t a good sign.  Star Wars has a place in my heart, and I have very high expectations for it.  When it first came out, it revolutionized film, but this is just another safe pre-sold adaptation to add to the pile.  I can think of few things that summarize the banality of modern films than the fact that the new Star Wars and Star Treks are being made by the same guy.  I'll probably see it with my dad. 


THE MAYBES

Jan. 16
D: Michael Mann
Michael Mann is one of the best action directors, and this movie has been getting praised by hackers for its rare accuracy on the subject.  However, the critical reception suggests that this may be Miami Vice (2006) all over again. It was ok. (7/10)

Jan. 23
D: David Koepp
It’s been panned by critics, but I’ve learned to take their advice with a grain of salt.  Still, I don’t feel like watching too many movies this month, so this might wait until video.

Jan. 16
D: Sean McNamara
Another nice-looking movie that can apparently wait until video.

May 22
D: Brad Bird
I’m not a fan of George Clooney, and Damon Lindelorf’s involvement is a bad sign.  Still, I love Brad Bird and the premise looks promising.  I just wish Bird would get back to animated movies.  Still, he seems to be really trying to make sure he has something great for Incredibles 2, and I respect that.

April 3
D: Jams Wan
I haven’t seen any of these movies, but I love car chases, and, despite my dislike for Saw, James Wan is a good director.  Oh, who am I kidding, I'm not going out of my way to see this.

The Fantastic Four
Aug. 7
D: Josh Trank
Ok, I know nothing about this, and there is no trailer, but this is a story due for a reboot.  I want Doctor Doom done right.

Oct. 2
D: Robert Zemeckis
The cinematography does a great job of triggering my acrophobia.  This might actually be worth seeing in 3D. 

The Good Dinosaur
Nov. 25
D: Peter Sohn
Another potentially promising movie from Pixar.

Krampus
Dec. 4
D: Michael Dougherty
I know little about this movie, but this is an idea that’s long overdue for a movie.



MOVIES I PROBABLY WILL NOT SEE

Feb. 6
D: Paul Tibbit
On principle I dislike the idea of Spongebob in 3D, but the animation looks surprisingly appealing.  However, I’m long past my Spongebob phase.

March 16
D: Neill Blomkamp
Sorry, Neill Blomkamp, but you’re 0 for 2, and I don’t intend to see this movie.

May 1
D: Joss Whedon
The trailer looks like it will be much more epic than the first movie, but they design trailers to mislead you like that.  James Spader’s Ultron looks very menacing, and he is a classic villain.  I like the trailer music.  I'm probably not going to see it in theaters.  One of its cast members is absolutely disgusting, and I also don't think Whedon is a terribly gifted visual director.  I mostly liked the first Avengers for its banter and found the visuals bland.

June 12
D: Colin Trevorrow
I’m not that big a fan of the Jurassic Park movies in the first place.  If they’re going to make a new movie, I’d much rather see an R-Rated book-faithful version directed by Danny Boyle or David Slade.  With John Murphy doing the score.

June 26
D: Pierre Coffin, Kyle Balda
I didn’t understand the popularity of these movies.

D: July 1
Alan Taylor
Another needless sequel to a series that should have been put down a long time ago (Salvation was okay, though).  This time, they’re undoing the whole original story!  Actual animals were considered for the role of Kyle Reese, but were rejected because producers thought they looked too much like Michael Biehn.  I also see that Hollywood is not over its love affair with wrecking perfectly good Dodge Monacos.  I like the trailer music, though.   


MOVIES I INTEND TO AVOID LIKE THE PLAGUE

Feb. 13
D: Sam Taylor-Johnson
Do I even have to explain this one?  I’m embarrassed for Danny Elfman’s doing the score for this movie.

Feb. 20
D: Steve Pink
I seem to be in the minority, but I hated Hot Tub Time Machine.  It was symptomatic of a time when we mistake mean-spirited bile for comedy.

March 13
D: Kenneth Branagh
Another bland live-action remake of an animated classic, but unlike the disappointing Maleficent this doesn’t have a charismatic and well-cast actress to sell it.  This is especially bad since Cinderella had some of the most beautiful and distinctive scenery I’ve seen in an animated movie.

Ted 2
June 26
D: Seth MacFarlane
Due to my dislike of Seth MacFarlane and everything he does, I did not see the last movie.  I won't see this one either.

July 17
D: Peyton Reed
This is where I’m taking a stand on the superhero movies.  The trailer looks underwhelming (complete with bad meta one-liners!), and the idea of relegating the original hero to a father figure to the new protagonist never works.  Also, I do not like Adam McKay, and his writing the movie confirms that I do not want to see it.  The costume looks good, though.

Point Break
July 31
D: Ericson Core
I’ve learned the hard way never to subject oneself to a movie written, but not directed by, Kurt Wimmer.  He’s a fun director and he should be getting more work in that field, but he frequently writes bland, hackish remakes of cheesy classics like this.  Such is Hollywood.

Monday, January 12, 2015

10 Years Ago...



 
The Transformers: The Movie
1986
D: Nelson Shin
**********
Pros: Animation, Music, Action, Solid First Act, Some Good Lines
Cons: Weak Writing, Meandering Plot, Inconsistent Animation, Continuity Errors

     
      …something momentous happened.  An epic battle between good and evil that changed the world with great loss of life on both sides.  I speak of course about Transformers: The Movie.  I was only one when this movie came out, so technically it’s before my time, but it still has a great amount of nostalgic value for me.  This is because my brothers watched Transformers and G.I. Joe religiously, and therefore I was exposed to them at a young age.  Transformers, along with Star Wars and Disney, were things I was weaned on.  I spent the middle of my childhood isolated from this film until I was reintroduced to it in high school.  I was more aware of the flaws then than I was as a small child, but it was still a thrill to revisit.  For all those flaws, it’s still leagues better than the travesties that Michael Bay had the nerve to pass off as Transformers movies.
      The movie, which was released after the first two seasons of the show, begins with the robotic planet Unicron (Orson Welles) attacking and devouring a populated world.  The sequence is effectively atmospheric despite one goofy use of stock sound effects.  After the prologue, the narrator (Victor Caroli) explains that the year is 2005.  The evil Decepticons have taken over the Transformers’ home planet of Cybertron, and the Autobots have regrouped to its moons.  A Decepticon spy observes Optimus Prime (Peter Cullen) ordering Ironhide (Cullen) to lead a supply run to Autobot City on Earth while also communicating with Jazz (Scatman Crothers), Bumblebee (Dan Gilvezon) and a now-grown Spike (Corey Burton).  Iron Hide would rather “bust the Decepticons’ chops” (an expression I have never heard outside these cartoons), but he obeys.  The message is relayed to Megatron (Frank Welker), who intercepts the Autobots’ shuttle and slaughters its crew.
      The scene is actually remarkably brutal.  While the characters are robots, and there is no blood to bleed, the visceral quality of the action rivals that of many R-Rated films.  While the Decepticons were usually depicted as ineffectual in the cartoon, Megatron is done f---ing around.  The animators were not squeamish about showing the technological equivalent of gore.  This is exasperated by the fact that this was a movie marketed toward children, a more sensitive demographic, and that these were beloved cartoon characters for them.  The explanation for this was cynical as it gets.  This was a toy-based franchise, after all, and Hasbro decided to introduce a new line of Transformers to replace the old characters, hence the Soviet purge.  The filmmakers saw themselves as hired guns and were surprised by the fact that these deaths actually upset fans!  This is odd because they clearly put some effort into making these deaths sad.  It’s amazing how sometimes artists don’t even realize the appeal of what they’re making.
     On earth young Autobot Hot Rod (Judd Nelson, in his obligatory “Just got famous last year” voice role) is fishing with Spike’s son Daniel (David Mendenhall), when the Decepticons attack Autobot City.  Hot Rod and an older Autobot named Kup (Lionel Stander) to join the fight.  Despite the efforts of Ultra Magnus (Robert Stack), Springer (Neil Ross), Arcee (Susan Blu), Blurr (John Moschitta, Jr.) and Perceptor (Paul Eiding), the heroes are hopelessly outnumbered.  Blaster (Buster Jones) sends a distress signal, which brings Optimus Prime to the battle.  Prime seeks out Megatron and confronts him alone.
     The battle itself is one of my favorite fight scenes.  It’s well-framed and choreographed, and the viewer gets the impression that this is a personal, emotional battle between good and evil where the fate of the world hangs in the balance.  Both parties have decided that the conflict must end on that day.  While inspiring 80’s rock is playing.  This is how a fight between Optimus Prime and Megatron should play out, Michael Bay.  Optimus eventually beats Megatron and is about to finish him off when Hot Rod, seeing the latter reaching for a hidden laser, pounces on him.  However, all he does is ruin Prime’s clean shot, allowing Megatron to fatally wound our hero.  Optimus manages to deal one last, incapacitating blow to the villain.  Starscream (Chris Latta), seeing an opportunity, orders a retreat so he can leave Megatron and take command but, being an idiot, he makes no effort to prevent Soundwave (Welker) from rescuing his master.  Thus, he throws a decisive victory with no apparent profit. 
      In a scene which caused much wailing and gnashing of teeth in real life, Optimus Prime dies in an Autobot hospital room, but not before transferring the Matrix of Leadership to Ultra Magnus.  The scene is poignant and broke the hearts of children everywhere.  I’m not sure I can think of a cartoon character so beloved by a generation being so brutally killed off during the height of his appeal.

      Meanwhile, the Decepticons are flying home on Astrotrain (Jack Angel) requests that they jettison weight.  They decide to sacrifice their wounded, and Starscream is only too happy to get rid of Megatron.  For some reason, Soundwave just lets this happen.  While drifting in space, Megatron encounters Unicron, who tasks him with destroying The Matrix, as it is the only thing that can destroy him.  In return he gives Megatron a new body, transforming him into Galvatron (Leonard Nimoy).  Other Decepticons are transformed into Cyclonus (Roger C. Carmel), Scourge and the Sweeps.  I love the transformation scene.  I live for 80’s aesthetic, and nothing says that like using traditional animation to simulate computer effects.  Galvatron travels to Cybertron, assassinates the newly crowned Starscream and leads the Decepticons in a second attack on Autobot City.  The overwhelmed Autobots are forced to retreat into space.  Meanwhile, Unicron attacks Cybertron’s moons, consuming Spike, Bumblebee, Jazz and Cliffjumper (Casey Kasem).  Spike rather infamously drops an S-Bomb in the scene.
      It’s here where the wheels come off.  The movie’s overall premise is sound: the leader of the protagonists is lost in a costly battle, and the remaining heroes’ backs are to the wall until a new leader emerges among them.  However, this idea is poorly executed due to the meandering nature of the plot.  While being chased through space by the Decepticons, the Autobots are separated and crash land onto two planets.  After Ultra Magnus is destroyed and relieved of The Matrix by Galvatron, his group is attacked by a group of robots called the Junkions led by Wreck-Gar (Eric Idle).  Their obnoxious gimmick is that they speak in advertising slogans gleaned from Terran broadcasts.  Imagine my annoyance when the “Autobots” are reduced to this gag in a certain movie.
     Meanwhile on the other planet, Hot Rod and Kup are captured by the Quintessons, a sinister race of robots who seem to share Tumblr’s attitudes on due process.  I will note that the movie does not do the obvious thing and team Hot Rod up with Daniel, instead making the latter a minor member of the other group.  They briefly meet Kranix (Norman Alden), the sole survivor of the planet in the movie’s intro, but he is quickly executed after telling them about Unicron.  They are rescued by the Dinobots (who have found an annoying new character named Wheelie (Welker) whom Michael Bay somehow managed to make more annoying) and make their way to rescue Ultra Magnus’ group.  Hot Rod makes peace with the Junkions with a universal greeting that Kup had recently taught to him.  This greeting is treated like some obscure knowledge among Autobots, which would make it somewhat less than universal.  Also, considering how effective it seems to be, you’d think the Autobots would make a point of teaching it to each other more often.  The Junkions reassemble Ultra Magnus (which is funny considering that Optimus Prime, who was shot a couple times, was a hopeless case And Magnus was blown into a million pieces) and promise to help our heroes fight Unicron in the final battle, but not before dancing.
     The biggest problem with this plot is the weakness of the designated protagonist.  It’s painfully obvious throughout the movie that Hot Rod is destined to inherit The Matrix, on account of his being a new, younger character given a disproportionate amount of attention.  There’s also some clumsy foreshadowing as well.  Granted, I like a good redemptive story, but Hot Rod doesn’t really do much to earn his status as a leader.  He may have good chemistry with the lovably curmudgeonly Kup, but he doesn’t display any real tactical insight throughout the movie.  In order to make him look more worthy, the writers disingenuously make more experienced and likable characters look incompetent in artificial ways.  Optimus gives The Matrix to the wrong person, who understandably displays a moment of indecisiveness during a heated battle.  But then again, it wasn’t Ultra Magnus’ bottomless stupidity that necessitated this succession in the first place.

      With The Matrix in his possession, Galvatron attempts to use it against Unicron, but he cannot open it.  Unimpressed, Unicron transforms into his robot form, ingests Galvatron and attacks Cybertron out of spite.  The transformation sequence is great, but the end result is disappointing.  Unicron’s robot form looks like an oddly proportioned cartoon devil with a vampire’s popped collar and a mouth that seems perpetually hung open in dull surprise.  The Autobots arrive and ram their ship into Unicron, once again becoming separated from each other inside the monster.  Daniel rescues Spike, Bumblebee, Jazz and Cliffjumper from Unicron’s digestive system.  Hot Rod faces off against Galvatron and defeats him, obtaining The Matrix and using it to destroy Unicron from the inside out.  He has now become Rodimus Prime, and now transforms into a tractor trailered version of his sports car form, which is pretty awesome.  Our heroes escape Unicron has he explodes, dancing feverishly until the end. 
This is how Orson Welles died.  Striking a literal disco pose.
The day is saved, and the stage is set for the third season of the show.
      The movie’s plot really isn’t very good, and after the first act it’s almost completely dependent on the animation and music to retain the viewer’s attention.  Transformers: The Movie is a feast for the senses for anyone who, like me, harbors an un-ironic and unapologetic love for 80’s style.  The animation of this movie is probably one of my favorite aspects of it.  Its quality is inconsistent, with some stilted moments and a wide range of detail in the artwork.  I hear there were two teams working on the movie, with one team being substantially better than the other.  This may have also explained the blatant continuity errors throughout the movie.  Many characters show up after their deaths, and the scale is all over the place.  The problem is bad enough for me to list in the summary, which is unusual with such mistakes.  However, when the animation shines, it really shines.  It’s done in a style that could be described as anime, and it has many clever properties I hardly ever see in the medium recently.  In fact, I can think of few cartoons that look quite like this, and I was pleased the job Toei Animation did on this movie.  The action is very well executed as well.  Most of the effects are done traditionally, with one early use of CGI for the opening credits.  
This screencap is cherry-picked, but look at it.  JUST LOOK AT IT.
       I also love the music.  Not being a communist, I love 80’s metal, and this move has very high-quality examples of the genre.  Most of the songs have a great hardcore feel to them that fits the atmosphere of this movie.  The classic Transformers theme gets a great cover for the movie by Lion.  Stan Bush’s “The Touch” is an excellent song as well.  However, the soundtrack isn’t all great.  Bush’s “Dare” is a pretty annoying song.  For some reason a scene features a Weird Al song whose message the movie’s writers took to heart.  Vince DiCola composed a synthesized score for the movie, and like most synthesized scores it alternates between sounding effectively atmospheric and downright goofy.
      The movie has good voice acting for the most part.  I’m not the biggest fan of celebrity voice casting, but most of the roles are played by respectable actors with distinctive voices.  The one exception is Judd Nelson, whose generic voice doesn’t make his presence age well.  It doesn’t help that I know of nothing relevant he did after this movie.  Orson Welles, who was apparently desperate for money, voiced Unicron in his final role, but his speech was so weak that the filmmakers had to filter his voice beyond all recognition.  It was a little like what would happen with Hugo Weaving’s “Megatron” in “Transformers,” except it was out of necessity and Unicron was not a preexisting character whose voice was already defined by an another actor.   The usual group of veteran voice actors also appears in this movie, including Michael Bell (Prowl, Swoop), Gregg Berger (Grimlock) and others.
     Aside from my own nostalgia for it, Transformers: The Movie seems to have been a significant movie for many who grew up in the 80’s.  While there had already been other animated movies that exposed children to darkness and danger while being much better (Secret of NIMH), I’m not sure I can think of any before this which involved characters that children had already grown attached to through a show.  It’s always momentous  when a show you love gets onto the big screen, and Transformers: The Movie was good example of how to do that.  The animation was significantly improved, the stakes were raised and the in-universe events were permanent and substantial.  The movie took the show’s premise, the conflict between the Autobots and Decepticons, and took it to a new level.  Conversely, G.I. Joe: The Movie failed because its plot discredited the entire premise of the franchise, but ultimately had no permanent effect on the continuity.  The Cobra-La twist was so unpopular it was immediately ignored, and Duke’s death was crudely revised in response to the reaction to Optimus’ death.  Also, the animation was not nearly as improved over the show, and the soundtrack was recycled from it.  Transformers: The Movie was downhill from the end of the first act, and G.I. Joe: The Movie was downhill from the opening credits.  I still think of Transformers as the ultimate TV-to-screen translation, and that’s one of the many reasons I love it despite all of its flaws.  On my list of guilty pleasure movies it ranks second, directly below Batman Returns and above Ultraviolet.  So while everyone else is selfishly complaining about the lack of hoverboards in 2015, I'll be too busy observing the ten-year anniversary of Optimus Prime's Death.

Besides, Transformers promised us this 10 years earlier.

                  

  
 DVD REVIEW
Transformers: The Movie – 20th Anniversary Special Edition
2006
Average
Pros: Good Special Features, Sound Options, Picture
Cons: Uncropped Version Is on the Wrong Disc, No English Subtitles


      Years after Rhino released a barebones edition of this movie, Sony BMG released this version.  The DVD is split into two discs, one featuring the fullscreen edition and the other featuring the widescreen.  Each disc has a variety of special features.  The first includes the widescreen edition with multiple commentaries and a neat feature which displays fun trivia during the movie.  One commentary track includes the filmmakers and some cast members while the second one is done by a few people who run fansites.  Both are fun to listen to.  I found it amusing how director Nelson Shin, who can apparently barely speak English, was occasionally goaded by the cast members into commenting on what was happening on screen.  As a result the poor guy was pointing out painfully obvious events in broken English. 
     The second disc has a few decent featurettes and some crude raw footage.  It’s mostly underwhelming, but it is interesting to see how faithfully the movie stuck to the storyboards.  My main problem with the DVD is that the movie was actually animated in fullscreen and cropped for theaters, and yet it’s the widescreen version that is on the main disc with all the good special features (and better disc art).  It’s a baffling and careless oversight.  That as well as the lack of English subtitles (because to hell with deaf people) prevent me from giving this DVD an above average rating.  The packaging is a standard DVD case, but I would have preferred the original movie poster art to the cover it had.  The movie is available in both original stereo and modified 5.1 surround, an improvement over the first DVD.  If I remember correctly the DVD also features promotional materials about the then-upcoming “Transformers” movie in which its filmmakers tell blatant lies about how it’s going to be about Transformers.