Thursday, December 26, 2019

The New Age of Animation


Hazbin Hotel
2019-
**********
Pros: Animation, Art Style, Comic Timing, Voice Acting
Cons: Writing Gets a Bit Crude, Scattershot


      

        I’m not going to lie, I think this show is refreshing, but this probably has a lot to do with my hatred for CalArts Style.  For a decade or so, animation companies have privileged this mediocrity, and I’m happy to say that independent creators are taking a stand (not to say there aren’t plenty of good-looking toons coming from studios here and there).  I liked Vivienne Medrano’s “Die Young” despite some technical nitpicks explained by its humble origins.  With a team of animators working together, Viv has now produced something that looks better than almost anything a studio is coming out with on TV.  It's also a sign of a new age of creators over studios, as their other video got more views than a Disney Star Wars clip released the same day.*
       The cartoon has garnered some undeserved controversy, mostly coming from the Cancel Culture Community.  Part of it involves absurd accusations that some the creators’ older and arguably tasteless artwork were offensive in unspeakable ways, even though it was blatantly clear that the pictures were not endorsing certain behaviors depicted and were not genuinely pornographic.  One crew member is the subject of accusations that could be explained as OCD symptoms, but the weird dream cult stuff, which may or may not have been exaggerated, was not fully denied by him.  This is the closest thing I’ve seen to a credible accusation, but I generally don’t support killing careers without a conviction.  There was also a rumor that disgraced voice actor Chris Niosi was involved with the product.  A quick IMDb search would prove otherwise.  

But we do need to cancel Blade Runner for promoting zoo/pedo stuff.  This character is four years old and look what she's doing to that snake!  

        The animation is very good.  It’s expressive and stylized akin to classic rubber hose style with a goth twist.  The atmosphere his enhanced by rich digital coloring.  I would like the shot framing to be better, but the characters still stand out effectively from the often somewhat busy background imagery.  Character designs fit the cast well, but I have one nitpick in the case of Alastor: his antlers are small to the point of being hardly noticeable.  Slightly annoying since antlers do tend to look sinister, and this is a sinister character.  On the other hand, I love how Sir Pentious does not have a permahood (a hood that remains permanently flared for no apparent reason), which I’ve seen on many cobra characters.  That this animation was produced independently doesn’t stop it from being impressive by professional TV standards, and has garnered praise from many professionals.
        Unfortunately, some people have decided to pretend otherwise, in the same way some people claim that Last Jedi is a good movie. This aesthetic gaslighting has become popular in the political arena, oddly enough, either as a pathology or an attempted exercise in power outside ideology.  What’s more, there seems to be a bunch of people who clearly like this general aesthetic. I suspect a lot of these are SoCal furries who never made it past the gate of the animation industry, gave up, and are now jealous of some people who actually accomplished something outside the system.
        A more valid criticism is the show’s humor.  Though it has its moments (like its blink-and-you’ll-miss-it background text), it’s mostly scattershot crudeness with a great deal of gratuitous cussing.  It’s been compared to Family Guy, but I think that’s unfair because Hazbin does not share that show’s overdependence on pop cultural references, which I actually have much less tolerance for than outright vulgarity.  It’s more like South Park for its blatantly late 90’s edge.  However, one strength of the animation is the way it enhances the humor.  Jokes are better when the characters' emotions are believable, for one thing.  I believe that delivery is often key to good comedy; there are multiple occasions where good delivery has salvaged a terrible joke (the latte spill from Zoolander) and poor delivery has ruined a very clever one (the black market bootleg toy ring run by Mall Santas in Jingle All the Way).  This moment is a good example of how Hazbin turned to lead into gold through impeccable timing, and it also confirms Alastor as having one of my favorite villainous temperaments.  I’d like more dry wit from this show and Husk has great potential for this: he could be like a cross between Shadow the Hedgehog and Michael Bluth.  The creators said they put in jokes they like, and I respect that, but it seems the high concentration of them is reflective of understandable assumptions that they might not make it past the pilot.  This might be a good thing, since it could be more restraint in the future.  Also, spin-off(?) Helluva Boss is funnier, even if it crosses some of my lines in terms of dark humor.    
        The voice acting is solid and it enhances the character development.  Charlie Magne (Jill Harris, Elsie Lovelock when singing) is the daughter of Satan and Lilith.  In response to the population of Hell’s being culled due to overpopulation, she runs a Hotel in which she plans to use to rehabilitate damned souls so they can go to heaven.  She perseveres despite her own doubts and the established rule that the Damned cannot be redeemed.  Almost everyone, including her own father (appropriately), tell her this is impossible.  I like this theme of hope in the face of hopelessness. Charlie is a light in the darkness despite her own demonic** roots.  Backing her up is her fiercely loyal girlfriend Vaggie (Monica Franco) and the lovable, violent mimbo Angel Dust (Michael Kovach), who cares about them more than he lets on.  He momentarily plays role of straw centrist so he and the audience can be given an exposition dump on the villain.
        The primary antagonist(?) is Alastor (Edward Bosco, Gabriel C. Brown when singing), a powerful demon who “supports” Charlie’s quest for no other reason that he wants to watch her fail.  It’s an interesting dynamic set up of a Neutral Evil Character who alternately helps and threatens the protagonists, only this time in closer and more constant proximity.  He brings to the table likably manic cleaning demon Niffty (Michelle Marie) and curmudgeonly bartender Husk (Mick Lauer).  Another villain is Sir Pentious (Will Stamper), who frequently engages in turf wars against Angel’s friend Cherri (Krystal LaPorte) with his army of Egg Bois (Joe Gran).  Other cast members include an odious anchor Katie Killjoy (Faye Matata) and her partner Tom Trench (Joshua Tomar).
       I could have a field day about the theology of the series, but that would probably be a bit too over-serious for a series like this. Some of the gripes concern the birth of people in Hell and, most seriously, the implication that angels come over and commit infernal genocide in spite of this.  It’s more like a fantasy in which Hell serves as a fantasty stand-in for some sort of prison colony (which explains why there are innocent people born here in addition to the presence up people sent there for a reason).  It can explain the corruption, since such places are no place to raise a kid, anyway.  There’s an interesting concept that the Damned simply indulge their vices without any real love, but then again we see genuine tenderness from some characters. Another interesting element as these souls know better than to have real respect for Satan outside fear, and they give none toward Charlie.  Theologically, I don’t expect much, so it’s a mixed bag.  I might as well nitpick when Satan is being depicted as being beholden to a Finnish hard rock frontman.
         Hazbin Hotel is imperfect, but it’s imperfect in a promising way.  I know this is overly optimistic when talking about a small indie animation, but many long-running shows (South Park, TNG, Adventure Time, The Simpsons) have started out rough, but stuck through because of a novelty hook with potential.  These shows just had to smooth out their edges and focus more on their strengths and appeal, whether it be a gimmick or not.  Hazbin Hotel can coast for a bit on its visuals before it realizes the potential of its story and characters (particularly Lucifer). To paraphrase another Star Trek show, it has flaws but it has teeth. 

And here's some fanart I made.





*There are some confounding factors, though, like people watching the Star Wars clip from multiple sources, but it's still impressive.
**Or possibly angelic, and I'm not the first to point that out.

Tuesday, December 24, 2019

You Know You're Wrong When You Fridge a Woman in a *War Movie*



Fury
2014
D: David Ayer
**********
Pros: Atmosphere, Score by Steven Price
Cons: Some Cheap Plot Points and a Flawed Character Arc


      David Ayer, with the help of cinematographer Roman Vasyanov, demonstrates better directorial acumen in this than he does in subsequent movies.  Wonderfully gritty depiction of the horrors moral corruption of war faced by a tank crew (Brad Pitt, Shia LaBeouf, Michael Pena, Jon Bernthal).  The film also stars Jason Isaacs.
      What brings the movie down is the primary arc of Norman "Machine" Ellison (Logan Lerman).  This kid is pretty ambivalent about killing Nazis until they accidentally kill a girl (Alicia von Rittberg) that Brad Pitt coerced him into having sex with as her mother older cousin (Anamaria Marinca) watches helplessly.  It's possibly the worst example of Fridging a Woman I've seen.


My video review of with GuanYu56 (please forgive the terrible audio quality)


Monday, December 23, 2019

Better Than Spaceballs


Galaxy Quest
1999
D: Dean Parisot
**********
Pros: Good Cast, Funny, Good Effects and Design
Cons: Not as Funny as It Starts Out, Mediocre Villain


     
      I remember when I first saw Galaxy Quest shortly after it came out on video.  I didn’t particularly care for it.  I recently figured that perhaps my sense of humor had matured since then, so I doublechecked it and I was fortunately right.  The movie is of the typical ersatz Three Amigos! formula, but it’s funnier than the last one I reviewed.  There’s even a bit of a Liar Revealed plot as the main character’s egotism causes him to play along with the hapless aliens’ delusion he is a real hero. 
     The movie introduces us to its cast of actors from a fictional version of Star Trek.  Our Kirk analogue is Jason Nesmith (Tim Allen).  Gwen DeMarco (Sigourney Weaver) played an objectified female officer whose role on the show was limited to repeating the ship’s computer.  She is moderately embarrassed by this shallow role.  Less mild in his embarrassment is Alexander Dane (Alan Rickman), a snarky Shakespearian actor whose alien character is known for a decidedly cheesy line.  A nice payoff is his earnestly reciting this line while comforting a dying alien (Patrick Breen) he has formed a connection with.  His cynicism toward his role could be a possible crossover reference to Alec Guiness, but I’m bugged by a brief scene in which he is seen in his home still wearing his head makeup despite his hatred for the role.  Other cast members include the clueless Fred Kwan (Tony Shalhoub), who played the ship’s ChEng, Tommy Weber (Daryl Mitchell) who played a gimmicky child pilot (Corbin Bleu), and Guy Fleegman (Sam Rockwell), a dead redshirt who tags along on the adventure and is later recast as a major character in the revived series (a reference to Star Trek’s frequent reuse of the same actors).  The flaws and quirks of Trek are effectively and affectionally ribbed throughout the movie.  I was afraid the movie was overpraised for making fun of fanboys in the same way that most 90’s Warner Bros. cartoons did during the preceding decade, but it’s brief and respectful.  One of them (a young Justin Long) even helps them win the day at the end.
      The witty dialogue and effective chemistry are utilized well in the first scene, in which the crew is preparing for yet another humiliating publicity stunt.  The timing is good, and the cinematography (Jerzy Zielinski) even uses a mirror to deliver a joke that appeals to my sometimes capricious taste in delivery.  A few more funny scenarios occur: a hung-over and bemused Nesmith is herded by the Thermians into what he thinks is an elaborate LARPing session but is in fact an actual attack on an enemy ship.  The cast witnesses a group of cute aliens turn on one of their wounded.  
        Unfortunately, the movie suffers from a common affliction: Plotting a Perfectly Good Comedy.  Usually, the opportunities for comedic strengths of some movies are discarded in the 2ndor 3rdact in the name of a formulaic, earnest plot. Fortunately, this plot is actually pretty effective, and there’s still enough decent humor that’s satirical enough to not be passed off as just comic relief.  The stakes are effectively high.  You actually care about these characters along with the too-good-for-this-universe Thermians (Enrico Colantoni, Missi Pyle, Jed Rees, and Rainn Wilson in his film debut).  I usually roll my eyes at assertions that “X parody is a better X serious work than X serious work,” but that applies to Galaxy Quest in a way that’s quite indictment of recent movies.  It’s definitely better than the Star Wars sequel trilogy, and it’s certainly more watchable than the bulk of the Star Trek reboots.  J.J. Abrams apparently said his favorite Trek movie was Galaxy Quest, so that probably explains something.
      The protagonist has an effective arc as the conceited egotist who learns humility.  He thrives on the publicity his co-stars dread until he hears someone hurt his fragile ego, causing him to lash out at fans and question his worth. After he and the crew are taken up by the Thermians, he plays along gleefully but desperately with the delusion until he owns up to them during tragic moments.  He then bonds with the crew and defeats the villain in a way far more satisfying that what I tend to see in more recent fare.  “I am Iron Man,” whatever.  Give me “dragging mines.”
         The Thermians are also good characters. Their true form (brought to life by Stan Winston and company) is very Cthulhu-like, and I like how the movie is sympathetic toward non-humanoids.  Because fiction is an alien concept to them, they mistake Galaxy Quest( the show) for “historical documents” and recreate the show’s ship (oddly enough with devices they have no way of knowing how to recreate) and recruit the crew.  This movie also has honesty points over The Invention of Lying by allowing the existence of disagreement among these aliens in their past.  Their simpering mannerisms while in human disguise are justified, and you still feel bad for them as they’re disillusioned by heroes’ coming clean and when they’re being tortured by Sarris. You feel good for them when they overcome adversity and strike out on their own.
     Sarris (Robin Sachs) is a weak point in the movie. While his costume is nicely detailed, it does not allow enough articulation in the face.  His mouth is permanently stuck in an odd little smile, and the actor doesn’t do too well, either.  Combined with his lack of interesting dialogue and one-dimensional personality, this makes for a rather bland villain.  He seems a possible inspiration for the villains in the first and third reboot movies, but then again at least unlike them he has some style.  This style also comes in the form of his ship, which looks (probably intentionally) like the lovechild of the Planet Killer and a D’deridex and has an interesting interior.  The heroes’ ship, the Protector also has a great design.  Special effects are pretty good, but there is some dated CGI. 
      A long-foreshadowed plot point is the Omega-13, a mysterious device on the Protector, whose purpose no one actually knows. Despite the common assumption that it will destroy all existence, Nesmith uses it to reverse time (based on a vague hunch by someone else that it will do something else) when Sarris successfully murders the heroes.  It’s upsettingly similar to the plot point that ruined Superman, but more forgivable since it is not done so lightly.  I can confidently say that any mention of this device can be removed from the movie without losing anything.
      Galaxy Quest is definitely an effective spoof that pleased both fans and creators.  It remains the best parody about the franchise, except maybe for certain sequences in STD.  In contrast, Orville isn’t so much a spoof as it is an earnest rehash of TNG with more lowbrow comic relief.  I also consider comparisons to Spaceballs to be heretical, as Galaxy Quest is actually funny and its satire involves intimate knowledge of the work besides outside jokes about merchandising.  The latter was clearly made with love.  And to think, I’ve been spending all these years thinking it was overrated.  Good thing we have anniversaries.      

Wait, what, is....is that an STD Klingon?!
  

Saturday, December 21, 2019

Christmas Carol Comparison, Pt. 10



OVERALL RATING

 10. A Christmas Carol (2009)
Jim Carrey
***********
Hit or miss. There’s a lot to like, but the stupid moments bring it down.  Not having the peevish "men of the cloth" line could have saved it from the bottom spot.  In fact it's even worse because it was shoehorned out of nowhere in an otherwise faithful narrative.  It's even more blatantly unearned than the "heroes on both sides" line from Episode III.  If they gave the story a a completely secularized Utilitarian/Malthusian overhaul, it wouldn't have been good but it would have been more aesthetically valid.


9. Bah, Humduck! A Looney Tunes Christmas Carol.  
Daffy Duck
**********
Mostly coasts on the popularity of the characters without living up to the franchise’s expectation. Looney Tunes focuses more on humor than Disney did, which is why it probably doesn’t do justice.  Then again, the movie is a very watered-down story that doesn’t make up for that in the humor department.


8. A Christmas Carol: The Musical (2004)
Kelsey Grammer
**********
Decent and faithful, but its artistic license yields mixed results.  It shares a major problem with the next entry…


7. A Christmas Carol (1999)
Patrick Stewart
**********
A well-executed and faithful straight adaptation.  But what’s the point of that if you’re not going to outdo the 1984 movie?  Out of principle I’m downranking this even though it’s technical better than some of the following.


6. Mickey’s Christmas Carol  
Scrooge McDuck 
**********
It’s a watered-down children’s cartoon version, but it’s well-executed for what it is and quite earnest. Well-animated as well.  Best unfaithful version.


5. The Muppet Christmas Carol
Michael Caine
**********
It remains faithful to the book while adding its own fun in creative ways.


4. Scrooged
Bill Murray
**********
An original, modern retelling, it does justice enough as an homage while being counted among the great comedies of the 80’s.


3. Scrooge (1951) 
Alastair Sim
**********
This classic and faithful black-and-white movie has aged quite well.  It’s regarded as the definite version before 1984.  Definitely worth checking out.


2. A Christmas Carol (1971)
D: Richard Williams
**********
Like a weekday morning short Mass, this version impressively condenses the meat of the source material into 25 minutes without losing much substance.  Heck, even most of the good lines are maintained.  The animation is excellent, but its dark, haunting visuals might be too much for some kids.  Overcame the visual limitations of its time.


1. A Christmas Carol (1984)
George C. Scott
**********
This is the best, bar none.  It’s aged perfectly, and it’s faithful.  The casting is great and the visuals are gritty.  If you can only see one version of this classic tale, make sure it’s this one. 

Christmas Carol Comparison, Pt. 9

<<< BEST FUTURE


MISC. CATEGORIES


NARRATOR
Not much to mention, but the Great Gonzo (Dave Goelz) and Rizzo (Steve Whitmire) stand out for adding some humor to the movie.  Gary Oldman in the 2009 version has a silly 4th Wall-Breaking at the end.  Fred (Roger Rees, 1984) doubled well as the Narrator, even though that seems to clash with Fred's oblivious nature.


BELLE 
I find Belle to be a somewhat problematic character.  It’s not made quite clear how far Scrooge had fallen when she broke up with him, and her reasons are vague.  It doesn’t help that she waited until it was too late for the tough love and didn’t give Scrooge a chance to repent.  It almost seems like she just got impatient with his trying to build up a nest egg for them and, by dropping her role as Morality Pet, is actually responsible for Scrooge’s fall.
The version that best addresses this is the 2004 musical, which makes it clear that Scrooge has already become cold-blooded by the time of the break-up, refusing a loan to Fezziwig of all people, by the time Emily (Jennifer Love Hewitt) leaves him.
The Mickey Mouse version dodges this issue by reversing the roles of unrequited love.  Scrooge callously rejects Daisy Duck (Patricia Parris). My second-favorite emoting from this version is when a weeping Daisy leaves his office, but then stops and glares back at him as her sorrow hardens into hatred.
Scrooged has Claire Philips (Karen Allen).  It helps that Frank is warmer toward her, and she is implied to have become callous herself in the unaltered future thanks to his influence.  It’s a bit forced, but it’s different to have this Scrooge actually corrupt a good person.  Frank sees this and realizes he always secretly loved her for her selflessness, regretting his advice for her to tone it down.


FEZZIWIG
In terms of casting, you can’t beat Ian McNiece from the Patrick Stewart adaptation in this role.
Brian Bedford from the 2004 musical also deserves a mention for being the aforementioned victim of Scrooge.


FRED
Donald Duck (Clarence Nash) is an ideal character for this role, and Dominic West (1999) was good as well.  


CRATCHITS
It’s hard to beat Miss Piggy (Frank Oz) as Mrs. Cratchit, but Leslie Manville gives a nice, poignant performance in the 2009 version.  Robin the Frog (Jerry Nelson) and the Disney (Dick Billingsley) are appropriately sympathetic as Tiny Tim.  Anthony Walters (1984) benefits from the best makeup but has the most underwhelming performance.  


FINALE
One problem I have with this book is the finale.  Along with Marley and Belle, it's the part of the story that could use some pragmatism in adaptations.  The segue form the nightmare of the Christmas Yet to Come is a bit quick, and then it drags on too long after the conflict has been resolved.  It's not like its the run time either; it usually lasts about 5-10 minutes, and it even drags in the 25 minute animated short.  The problem is that it feels like a checklist of the following things one must sit through before the credits:
   1. Scrooge dances happily in his bedroom
   2. Scrooge negotiates a vicarious turkey purchase with some kid
   3. Said turkey is shown loaded onto a carriage to confirm that it was not delivered to the
       Cratchits via Flying Monkey
   4. Scrooge shyly asks to join Fred's party in a genuinely poignant moment
   5. Scrooge starts acting nice to Bob but not before playing a cruel practical joke on him
   6. Scrooge carries Tiny Tim on his shoulder while the obligatory verbatim closing narration
       is spoken
The funny thing is that most of this is not even necessary because it's implied that will sort these things out after his redemption.  Mickey's Christmas Carol at least condenses this.



PLAYING PRODUCER
People I would choose if to make a new version.

DIRECTOR
Denis Villeneuve or maybe Gareth Edwards

CINEMATOGRAPHER
Roger Deakins, Greig Fraser

COMPOSER
Hans Zimmer or Michael Giacchino (different but equally valid approaches)

SCROOGE
Ian McDiarmid, Hugo Weaving, Charles Dance, Gary Oldman

MARLEY
Ben Mendelsohn

YOUNG SCROOGE
Hayden Christensen, Christian Bale, Daniel Radcliffe, Domnhall Gleeson

MRS. CRATCHIT
Julie Walters

BELLE
Natalie Portman

FEZZIWIG
Roger Allam

GC PRESENT
Keith David, Tom Hardy (with a body double of course), David Harbour, Robbie Coltrane, Clancy Brown, Jim Cummings. it's difficult to beat the 84 version.

GC FUTURE
Doug Jones





Christmas Carol Comparison, Pt. 8



THE GHOST OF CHRISTMAS FUTURE
As a tall, introverted person, I relate to GCF.  He’s actually the least antagonistic toward Scrooge, he simply shows him the tragedy that awaits, and can’t help his terrifying appearance.  And the poor guy's the one who gets called scary.  Then again, I also relate to GCPr’s righteous fury and hair-trigger temper. 





10. GERALDINE CHAPLIN
A Christmas Carol: The Musical
Well, points for originality, I suppose?  Still pretty anticlimactic to turn GCF into a little old lady.  Still, her song is decent, and she comes off as creepy once.  This ghost suffers the most from the decision to make them normal people as well.  No mystery at all.





9. PETE
Will Ryan, Mickey’s Christmas Carol
Um, ok, GCF is not a villain?  At first he’s effectively creepy, but then he opens his mouth and reacts with sadism to Scrooge’s death.



8. TAZ
Jim Cummings, Bah, Humduck!
Taz is neither mysterious nor genuinely scary, but this a surprisingly faithful version because, despite his savage appearance, he’s the least antagonistic and has a heart.





7. ROBERT TYGNER, DON AUSTEN
The Muppet Christmas Carol
A good-looking steel blue cloak helps, but this is a typical problem with this character: an awkwardly tall head area on a normal person in suit.  He’s also accompanied by a cheesy swirl-wipe effect.




6. JIM CARREY
A Christmas Carol (2009)
He can make you cower with a mere flailing of his arms.  I like the clever decision to show him primarily as a shadow for some scenes, and it would have been very nice if had they stuck to that.  He ends up flashing exaggerated google eyes that remind me of image morphs on the preview images of snarky YouTube reviews.  The Future sequence also features one of the worst slapstick sequences in the movie, which goes on for four minutes, at the end of which Scrooge shrinks and has a tiny cartoon mouse voice!  




5. TIM POTTER 
A Christmas Carol(1999)
They eyes are creepy and different, but they detract from the mystery.





4. ANNIE WEST
A Christmas Carol (1971)
Looks fine, but is a bit of a letdown by the creepy standards of this movie’s visual style.

3. CZESLAW KONARSKI
Scrooge (1951)
Has an excellent introduction, and though I’d like to see more, he is effectively used.  He also points funny, and that helps give him an alien feel.





2. ???
Scrooged 
Possibly the most terrifying design, with a gory form under that cloak that’s possibly inspired by Ignorance and Want.




1. MICHAEL CARTER
A Christmas Carol(1984)
The most artfully shot version.  The movie’s atmosphere is great the whole way through, but unlike most Christmas Carol adaptations, it saves its best directing for last.  He also communicates using a terrifying metallic wail straight out of the Unsolved Mysteries theme.  He’s scary despite this one unintentionally funny moment in which he disco-glides across the screen.  Carter (whom you might know as Bib Fortuna or as a guy who gets killed by a werewolf in the London Underground) uses his frame and body language effectively.  He maintains the passive nature of the character while coming off as mildly impatient at times with Scrooge’s obliviousness.   Martin Wood as body double.  



Christmas Carol Comparison, Pt. 7



THE GHOST OF CHRISTMAS PRESENT
Along with GCF, he’s my favorite character.  His rightful judgment of Scrooge’s selfishness complements his positive façade. He’s often sardonic.  He has potential to be a rare heroic example of one of my favorite villainous temperaments.





10. JIM CARREY
A Christmas Carol (2009)
The use of colors is particularly rich with this character, and his performance is surprising effective.  He adds some glib humor to the role.  His exit is one of the most needlessly overdone moments in the film, and the interpretation of Ignorance and Want trades creepiness for ridiculousness.  This adaptation adds an anti-religious dig at "men of the cloth," which brings this version down in the ranking.  It seems particularly at odds with his Judeo-Christian moralizing.




9. CAROL KANE
Scrooged
Cloud Cuckoolanders can be very tiresome unless they’re creative enough, and this grating harpy is no exception.  Her “humor” consists solely of randomly kicking Frank in the crotch (without any clever timing or context) her “look how goofy I am” demeanor.




8. WILLIE THE GIANT
Will Ryan, Mickey’s Christmas Carol

A clumsy, but surprisingly sensible, version of a character who matches the role in appearance, if not personality.  





7. YOSEMITE SAM
Maurice LaMarche, Bah, Humduck!
An appropriate choice. His antagonistic attitude matches the character.  While he and Granny both physically abuse Daffy, he actually does so effectively in one moment in which he accentuates a point by punching Daffy in the arm.




6. FELIX FELTON
A Christmas Carol (1971)
A competent version of the character who boasts the one flaw in the movie’s animation: Chest hair that looks like a brown manbra.  Ignorance and Want are particularly terrifying in this one.




5. JESSE L. MARTIN 
A Christmas Carol: The Musical
A good choice of actor, but this is brought down substantially by an incredibly tedious and pointless song number.




4. DESMOND BARRIT
A Christmas Carol (1999)
Another decent, faithful version.  This one focuses more on sadness.




3. FRANCIS DeWOLFF
Scrooge (1951)
Breaking the tie for coming first.  The booming voice is nice.




2. JERRY NELSON
The Muppet Christmas Carol
The obvious runner-up for having the sense to realize that it wasn’t going to top the 1984 version. Instead, the character’s jolliness is emphasized while maintaining solemnity for appropriate moments.  He sings the most energetic and enjoyable song in the movie.




1. EDWARD WOODWARD
A Christmas Carol (1984)
Seriously, there is no touching this guy, the absolute GOAT.  This is a man who is 100% done with Scrooge’s shit.  His emotions range from sardonic laughter, to seething contempt, to full-blown rage.  It’s all justified.  Martin Wood as body double.






HONORABLE MENTION:
GHOST OF CHRISTMAS PAST
David Johansen, Scrooged
He’d rank as #3 between the 1951 and Muppet versions.


Christmas Carol Comparison, Pt. 6


THE GHOST OF CHRISTMAS PAST
The most ethereal of the spirits, its appearance represents how the past is perceived as a ghost.  In contrast, GCPr is more fleshed out, and GCF is shadowy and frightening.  GCPa often comes off as unjustifiably judgmental over Scrooge’s tragic past, but that could represent the nature of self-reflection.







10. GRANNY AND TWEETY
June Joray and Bob Bergen, Bah, Humduck!
A lame one-note performance in which Granny simply repeatedly punches Daffy for being a bad person.




9. JIM CARREY
A Christmas Carol (2009)
It’s a very creative design, but it ultimately fails.  Ironically, the usually off-putting MC animation (which would have helped here) is unintentionally farcical as it features Jim Carrey’s actual face grafted onto a flame.  His performance is a little too silly, and it ends with one of the movie’s more uncalled for slapstick sequences.



8. JIMINY CRICKET
Eddie Carroll, Mickey’s Christmas Carol
A fair choice for this role, I suppose.  Meh.



7. ANGELA PLEASENCE
A Christmas Carol(1984)
Not bad, but not that good, either.




6. MICHAEL J. DOLAN
Scrooge (1951)
A serviceable interpretation.




5. DIANA QUICK
A Christmas Carol(1971)
The first of the truly alien and ghostly designs.  The triple-vision effect was a noble attempt to stay true to the ambiguity of the book’s description.





4. JESSICA FOX
w/puppeteers Karen Prell, Robert Tygner, and William Todd-Jones, The Muppet Christmas Carol
Oddly creepy, it gets points for its creative design and interesting puppetry.




3. JANE KRAKOWSKI
A Christmas Carol: The Musical
A graceful and feminine version.  This one is improved by judging Scrooge for past sins he did commit.  This version also interprets the Ghosts as also appearing as normal people in real world, a decision I have mixed feelings about.



2. DAVID JOHANSEN
Scrooged
In an interesting twist, Scrooged decided to switch the characterizations of GCPa and GCPr. I generally prefer the latter anyway, which is probably why I like this sardonic GCPa.





1. JOEL GRAY
A Christmas Carol(1999)
I like his design (which seemed to foreshadow that of Jeremy Irons’ Lead Warlock), and Gray’s idiosyncratic performance cinches it.



DISHONORABLE MENTION:
GHOST OF CHRISTMAS PRESENT
Carol Kane, Scrooged
This character would rank at the bottom of this list.