Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Favorite Characters from Bad Movies, Pt. 1



PART 2 

Sometimes cool characters just seem to get lost and end up in bad movies.  Here’s my list of characters unfortunate enough to have this happen to them.  A few disclaimers, though:
                -If there are two characters who stand out, I’ll dedicate a spot to them, but no more
                -If a minor character is also not significant enough, I might give them an honorable mention   
                under another character
                -I’m not including sequels if it they substantially feature likable recurring characters (Colonel
                Stuart (William Sadler) from Die Hard 2 gets an honorable mention, though)
              -Or sympathetic characters whose likability is too much of a given, such as the title character of
                Jack (1996)





30. SPEED
Steven Wright, The Swan Princess Series (1994-)
He’s a likable character overall, and I like how his dreary voice contrasts with the fact that he’s actually a rather positive person.

 
 29. GRU
Steve Carrell, Despicable Me Series (2010, 2013, 2017)
A pretty likable character with style and a lovable loser quality, but he’s not likable enough to carry the movies.  His name is also a nice historical allusion.


 28. MITTENS
Susie Essman, Bolt (2008)
Bolt is pretty much a rehash of Buzz Lightyear, and the hamster is a generic fanboy-like character, but Mittens is pretty complex.  She acts tough and intimidates birds with her claws for food, but she’s actually a frightened, de-clawed cat who was abandoned by her owners.  Also, kudos for using a relatively unknown voice-actress in a celebrity-dominated cast. 
HONORABLE MENTION: Penny and her mother, who both provide some good emotional moments.


 27. GOVERNOR RADCLIFFE
David Ogden Stiers, Pocahontas (1995)
One of the few interesting characters in this movie.  I like Stiers’ voice acting and this song.  Also, there’s this line.
HONORABLE MENTION: Meeko and Flit, the comic relief animals, do manage to be funny in one scene.

 26. OPAL
Geraldine Chaplin, Nashville (1975)
It’s been a while since I watched this movie, and I don’t remember being particularly impressed by it.  The only part of the movie I like is the scene in which she’s covering a junkyard full of cars in a forced attempt to be poetic.  Then again, it's been a while since I've seen the movie.

 
 25. ELI MICHAELSON
Alan Rickman, Nobel Son (2007)
It’s a completely underwhelming and missable movie aside from starring a snarky Alan Rickman.


 24. VIKTOR
Nighy, apparently aware he’s in a mediocre movie, gives an enjoyably hammy performance in Evolution and even has a few good sarcastic lines in Rise of the Lycans.  I don't think he's amusing enough in the first movie to comment on here.


 23. AGENT HARRY LEE
Terry Chen, Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002)
The only good thing about this mediocre film (aside from the action scenes’ having their moments) is this mauveshirt who miraculously survives the movie despite showing the protagonist a photo of his family.  Respect.


 22. WHITTINGTON
Gregory Hines, Wolfen (1981)
A witty character, he was the only person in the movie I cared enough about to see live.  Unfortunately, he also happened to be the black character in a horror movie.  At least he did a funny double-take before the wolf killed him.


 21. BUTCH CAVENDISH
William Fichtner , The Lone Ranger (2013)
This isn’t going to be the last appearance William Fichtner on this list.  He seems to have a thing for being the redeeming feature of bad movies.



Movies That Wouldn't Be So Bad If They Were Stand-Alone Works



Sometimes our judgment of movies is influenced by our views on their source material.  An adaptation should generally be faithful enough to the spirit of the source material, if the latter is worthy.  Sometimes we can’t always judge movies in a vacuum.  Here are some movies that would be better (or at least not so bad), if they weren't based on something. 
      HONORABLE MENTIONS:  Though I have read and enjoyed The Hunchback of Notre Dame, I still love The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996), which is definitely above-average by Disney standards.  I'm not going to score many points with Alan Moore's fans, but I think V for Vendetta (2006) is a fine movie in its own right, and actually in many ways an improvement over the comic.  I would say that Silent Hill (2006) is the only genuinely good video game movie I’ve seen, but I honestly don’t know enough about the games to make that call.


14. Live Free or Die Hard
2007
D: Len Wiseman
A lot of the appeal of the Die Hard movies was the premise of an everyman going up against the odds in spite of his own fear and some injury, be it mutilated feet or a bad hangover).  In this movie John McClane is less fearful, more callous, and his handicap is apparently baldness.  He even shoots an unarmed man!  The movie still has good comic relief and excellent stylized action.  It's a fun movie and, for what it's worth, Wiseman's most enjoyable work.
 




13. The Secret of NIMH 2: Timmy to the Rescue
1998
D: Dick Sebast
People may balk at this, but I don’t think this movie would get half the hatred if it wasn’t a disappointing sequel to the beloved animated classic.  Otherwise, it would probably end up being a middling-to-mediocre direct-to-video cartoon that would be largely forgotten outside a modest following of furries.
 





12. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
2008
D: Steven Spielberg
It would have been a fun, gonzo Indiana Jones-inspired movie, and the sanitization would not have been an issue.  Especially since it disappoints on the promise of Indy’s killing commies.







11. Alien Resurrection
1997
D: Jean-Pierre Jeunet
It’s an off-beat, tongue-in-cheek sci-fi movie with some interesting ideas.  The genre-bending decision may seem understandable if you consider how well that worked with Aliens.  Unfortunately, it didn’t fit the franchise.  As a stand-alone, it could have been like the movie Fifth Element should have been.



 


10. Terminator 3
2003
D: Jonathan Mostow
Same thing as Crystal Skull.  Would have worked better as a parody of Terminator 2 or a T2-inspired work of passable hackery with good action and comic relief.  Not to mention its depressing fatalism could have also been avoided.
 






9. RoboCop 2
1990
D: Irvin Kershner
I like the cyberpunk atmosphere, stop-motion, and ultraviolence.  However, Kershner was unable to strike that subtle tongue-in-cheek tone that Verhoeven could, and the movie was a total farce that did not do justice to the original.







8. Alien³
1992
D: David Fincher
Heck, it would have been a great movie if not for the depressing deaths of Hicks (if you don’t buy this absurdly contrived retcon) and Newt.  At least, unlike T3, it respected us too much to pretend it could be fun after giving the previous movie a depressing retcon.




 

7. The Star Wars Prequels
1999, 2002, 2005
D: George Lucas
George Lucas’ intentional homage to the days of silent film serials would have worked as such if he made them separate from the original trilogy.  Whether he liked or not, Episodes IV-VI had developed into more conventionally well-made movies.  If it his original vision was different, he should have started over with a clean slate.  If the prequels had not tainted the franchise, more people (including myself) would enjoy them as the enjoyable schlock that they are.





6. Star Trek Into Darkness
2013
D: J.J. Abrams
I seem to be in the minority in thinking that this was the only remotely watchable Star Trek reboot.  The plot would work perfectly well without connections to the franchise; in fact, it would even work better.  The only real flaw with the movie was its forced homages to Wrath of Khan in the third act.  Also the whitewashing of Khan wouldn’t have been an issue.  It would have been seen as a solid, fun space movie, and it kinda is. 





5. Pain and Gain
2013
D: Michael Bay
This would be a hilarious dark crime-comedy if not for one thing.  It was based on a true story, which makes it kinda tasteless.  In an interesting twist on the sadly common Oscar bait tactic of demonizing real people for “dramatic effect,” it makes the victims out like assholes so we can find the Sun Gym Gang’s crimes amusing.  Meanwhile, the gang members, which the exception of Lugo, are depicted as lovable bumblers who were dragged along by him. 

 



2007
D: Michael Bay
Vulgar and utterly contemptuous of its source material.  Even if it wasn't an adaptation it would be a passable popcorn movie at best.  Click the link if you want more details.







3. Super Mario Bros.
1993
D: Rocky Morton, Annabel Jankel
A fun, campy, visually interesting movie with two likable protagonists and a sense of humor.  At least that’s what it would be if it wasn’t based on Mario.  It takes a special kind of obliviousness to make a Mario live-action cyberpunk movie with humans playing all the non-human characters.





2. The Dark Knight Rises
2012
D: Christopher Nolan
This would have been a perfectly fine movie if not for the pretense that it had anything to do with Batman.  In fact, the biggest movie’s biggest flaw (Bruce Wayne’s insultingly quick recovery from having his freaking back broken) seemed like an attempt to shoehorn an iconic moment from the comics into an incompatible plot.  Moreover, while I don’t mind the alleged well-deserved dig at OWS, I believe politics should be kept out of the franchise.   





1992
D: Tim Burton
I already went on about this movie at length, calling it one of my favorite bad movies.  However, without the absurdly out-of-character depiction of the Penguin and some lethal acts of violence from Batman, this would movie would literally be on the par with Batman (1989) and The Dark Knight (2008) as a great Batman movie.  If it would wasn’t a Batman movie, it would be on the par with Batman and Edward Scissorhands (1990) highly among Burton’s masterpieces.

Friday, September 1, 2017

"Pro-Life but Pro-Choice"



Juno
2007
D: Jason Reitman
**********
Pros: Some Good Arcs and Emotional Moments, Some Funny Lines, Story Had Potential
Cons: Not That Funny, Inorganic Characterization and Dialogue, Some Childish Moments, Immature Treatment of Abortion Issue, Two Deal-Breaking Scenes, Bland Soundtrack



       Ten years ago today, this movie was released.  It seemed promising enough: it was a dry comedy starring Jason Bateman and Michael Cera that was getting pretty good reviews (which might have been the result of bribery).  The dialogue in Diablo Cody’s script was subject to a great deal of praise culminating in an Academy Award win for Best Original Screenplay.  This praise was actually rather overblown.  While some recognized it as overhyped from the beginning, others took a while to have that epiphany.  In fact, “to Juno” [3] is now a term that means “to look back at something you liked and realize it wasn’t that good.”  I suspect that the movie’s initial popularity was the result of its short-term appeal to three different groups of people:
1.       Hip youngsters who were tricked by the presence of Jason Bateman and Michael
Cera (as well as the orange motif) into thinking they were watching something as funny as Arrested Development
2.       Pro-Lifers who can’t take a hint
3.       People who like to ogle pregnant teenagers
One of these groups got its money's worth.
So now I’m going to go into more detail why I’m not that big a fan of this movie while at long last bringing closure to my crusade against overrated* 2007 movies.
       Movie begins with a rotoscope of 16-year-old Juno MacGuff (Ellen Page) walking while drinking copious amounts of liquid.  When the picture transitions to live-action, she enters a store run by Rollo (Rainn Wilson) and buys a pregnancy test, which she uses in the store bathroom.  Upon getting a positive result, she remarks, “The little pink plus sign is so unholy,” and Rollo responds with, “That ain’t no Etch-a-Sketch.  That’s one doodle that can’t be undid, Homeskillet.”  And here is one of the main problems of the movie: people forego acting like actual people so they can’t force in contrived quips all the time.  You’d think that a confused, frightened teenager wouldn’t talk in jokes upon confirming an unwanted pregnancy while a bystander would sympathize with her plight.  It makes you wonder why this movie got a Screenplay Oscar.

Gifts of obsolete novelty phones are too much to resist, I guess.
      You also might have noticed how dreadfully unfunny those lines were.  Most of the jokes are forced, and there are some that are so lame, like “I’m the cautionary whale,” they make you wonder whether or not they were bad attempts at anti-humor.  Diablo Cody (b. 1978) apparently can’t resist reminding us that she’s a child of the 80’s while writing a movie about children born in the 90’s.  Even some attempts to imitate Millennial slang are pretty awkward in ways I haven’t seen since that of many 90’s children’s shows; at least the movie is up to date when it comes to being behind the times.  While there are some funny lines, many of these are said at inappropriate times.  Almost everything has to be a quip, and that’s a problem that takes you out of the conflicts of so many movies nowadays.  I simply don’t understand how Star Wars supposedly has such obviously bad dialogue while Juno deserves a Screenplay Oscar for lines like “Honest to blog.”
       Juno then informs the father, classmate Paulie Bleeker (Michael Cera), in a decidedly contrived, hipster-pseudohumorous way.  She gathers an easy chair with a whole bunch of furniture to make a living room set outside his house and waits for him in said chair like a Bond villain until he exits his house for his morning jog.  Apparently this is supposed to represent the fact that they conceived their child during sex on a chair.  It’s an attempt at symbolism so concrete and literal it’s practically child-like and all it accomplishes is that it makes the protagonist seem less credible as a person.  Another reason this scene exists is to force a motif that was already sufficiently handled at the beginning and end of the movie.  “It began with a chair” because Paulie knocked Juno up in a chair in a rash act of sexuality.  “It ended with a chair” with the maternal rocking chair of the adoptive mother, symbolizing a development from immaturity to maturity.    
        Juno and Paulie agree that she should get an abortion.  She discusses the options with her friend Leah (Olivia Thirlby).  She enters the abortion clinic after a brief encounter with classmate Su Chin (Valerie Tian), who was protesting the clinic outside, and decides at the last second not to go through with it.  She looks for interested parents in classified ads with Leah (occasionally making unwarranted snark about some of them) and settles on a couple.  She then breaks the news to her father Mac (J.K. Simmons) and step-mother Bren (Allison Janney).  While I realize that the last thing a pregnant teenager needs is more pressure, they barely even seem to mind.  Not much real shock or internal conflict, just…quips.  There is still some tactlessness, just not the understandable kind.  Mac agrees with Juno that she’s not ready to raise a child, but needlessly brings up a past mistake she made because the movie went twenty seconds without an attempt at humor.  His calm makes it worse.  There’s an almost calculating quality to it.  He even makes a rather uncharitable statement about the possibility of her getting ripped off about “baby-starved wingnuts.”  It makes you wonder why this movie got a Screenplay Oscar. 
          Juno meets with the adoptive parents Mark and Vanessa Loring (Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner).  While her relationship with the more serious Vanessa is initially stand-offish, she immediately hits it off with Mark, due to their shared interest in grunge (a tribute to how in touch Cody is with younger Millennials).  Despite first impressions, Juno ends up being closer to Vanessa because of their shared connection with the baby and their strong sense of responsibility.  Meanwhile, Mark, finally admitting that he’s not ready to have a kid because of his dreams of being a rocker, leaves Vanessa and Juno to fend for themselves.  Heartbroken, Juno desperately flees this situation while leaving a note at their door.  This arc is refreshing for its irony and poignancy.
        These scenes are interspersed with rather inane scenes from Juno’s whitewashed, stuck-in-the-80’s high school.  They’re mostly opportunities for more bad jokes, but it eventually develops the protagonist’s relationship to Paulie Bleeker.  Despite an earlier agreement to break up, she confronts him when he finds another girlfriend.  She admits she’s still in love with him as he reminds her that the break-up was her call and it broke his heart.  During one of their more serious moments, Juno invites Paulie to feel the baby, and this scene illustrates that Michael Cera, despite assertions to the contrary, can really act.  When she is rushed into labor, she doesn’t tell Paulie about it so he can complete his track meet.  Upon doing so, he realizes she isn’t there and rushes out the hospital.  Then Vanessa comes to the hospital to joyfully adopt the baby boy.  The movie ends happily with Juno and Paulie together and Vanessa taking care of her new child with the letter from Juno framed on the wall reading “Vanessa: If you’re still in, I’m still in. –Juno.”  It would have been nice for that to be the final shot.
        I would have given Juno a pass as a decent, if somewhat flawed and overpraised, film if not for two rather childish scenes.  The first scene is with Su Chin’s protesting the abortion clinic.  It’s almost quaint by today’s standards, but it is contemptuous and reflects the feelings of the movie’s creators.  First off, she’s chanting the rather foolish slogan “All babies want to get borned,” which implies that pro-lifers have an erroneous view on fetal cognition and…grammar.  The latter is particularly troubling considering that this is the most prominent token minority of the movie.  Juno isn’t the only questionable movie to find itself in the overlap of a rather odd Venn diagram. 

Apparently, this might actually be a thing.
The scene casts doubt on any attempt to pass the movie off as some sort of accidental pro-life tract.  It’s almost like Diablo Cody realized the movie came off a little too pro-life, so she added this scene to temper that accidental theme a little.  The movie panders to pro-life sentiment while shaming pro-life principle.  It makes you wonder why this movie got a Screenplay Oscar. 
        There is an even more brazenly childish scene in which an ultrasound technician (Kaaren de Zilva) displays a lack of bedside manner by mentioning that teen motherhood situations are usually a poisonous environment after hearing that Juno intends to put the child up for adoption.  Bren, not satisfied to simply call her out on her presumption, goes on this shallow, ignorant rant about the woman’s profession, implying through lame outside jokes that an idiot can do it based only on what she, as an outsider, sees.  This is like saying I can be a lawyer just because I can put on a suit.  I’d hate to shame Diablo Cody’s career history (assuming the line was written by her; it seems to be consistent with the dialogue’s style), but I’m pretty sure maintaining and operating important, complicated medical equipment is more respectable than stripping.  It makes you wonder why this movie got a Screenplay Oscar. 
             These scenes are relatively severe symptoms of this movie’s primary affliction: trying to be too funny too often.  Sometimes, banter is like ketchup in that it should be used in extreme moderation, if it should be used at all.  The better quips would have worked well in this movie in moderation (or if they were funny enough).  There are a lot of strengths in the movie.  It has a strong, independent young protagonist who uses a surprisingly amount of initiative in a usually stressful situation.  Her arc emphasizes maturity (I guess you could argue that a tone shift is symbolic of that, but in that case it still should have been funnier).  Her personality balances stoicism with moments of pathos, but her likability and credibility are diminished by the forced and unfunny snark.  Movie develops into a poignant climax with a heartwarming conclusion.  But it was spoiled because it didn’t know when not to be funny.

[opening line]
JUNO: It started with a chair.

JUNO: It ended with a chair.

MARK: You could just wait a couple months.  It’s not like the baby’s going to storm in here any second and demand dessert-colored walls.

MARK: Why does everyone think yellow is gender neutral?  I never knew a guy with a yellow room.

VANESSA: How do I look?
BREN: Like a new mom.  Scared shitless.

JUNO: [in a letter left outside the Lorings’ home after their breakup] Vanessa: If you’re still in, I’m still in. –Juno”


*Technically, 300 was first released in 2006, but its wide release was in 2007, and it was one of the movies that year I had to hear everyone go on about.